NASA's PCBoom sonic boom propagation code has recently been updated to improve the code's numerical accuracy and efficiency. This paper specifically discusses algorithms for calculating the ray tube area, accounting for turbulence effects, and determining the entire sonic boom carpet. Unlike most existing sonic boom propagation codes that require three or four neighboring acoustic rays for the ray tube area calculation, the updated PCBoom requires only one ray to perform the same calculation. In addition, the turbulence algorithm employed here is based on a multiple-scattering theory rather than based on a one-way parabolic equation used by existing algorithms. Numerical models obtained using the updated PCBoom are compared with a measured dataset from the Quiet Supersonic Flights 2018 research campaign (QSF18) that NASA conducted in Texas in 2018. The dataset was obtained using dive maneuvers performed by supersonic conventional aircraft that generated small-amplitude sonic booms, called sonic thumps, mostly with small elevation angles of arrival. In such sonic booms, the effects due to turbulence and spreading from refraction are large, making the dataset suitable for assessing the code's performance to accurately predict such effects.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2019
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
October 01 2019
Updates to PCBoom sonic boom propagation code: Modeling QSF18 sonic thumps
Joel B. Lonzaga
Joel B. Lonzaga
Structural Acoust. Branch, NASA Langley Res. Ctr., 2 N. Dryden St., B1208 MS 463, Hampton, VA 23681, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Joel B. Lonzaga
Structural Acoust. Branch, NASA Langley Res. Ctr., 2 N. Dryden St., B1208 MS 463, Hampton, VA 23681, [email protected]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 146, 2752 (2019)
Citation
Joel B. Lonzaga; Updates to PCBoom sonic boom propagation code: Modeling QSF18 sonic thumps. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 2019; 146 (4_Supplement): 2752. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5136528
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Comparison and regression analysis of lateral sonic boom measurements and PCBoom predictions
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2022)
Simulations and case study of X-59 low-booms propagated through measured atmospheric profiles
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. (August 2021)
Simulations of X-59 low-booms propagated through measured atmospheric profiles in Galveston, Texas
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2020)
NASA supersonic testing: Streets, suburbs, and sonic booms
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2019)
Regression analysis of meteorological, aircraft trajectory, and ambient effects on sonic boom metric variability
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2022)