Conventional wisdom states that having concave surfaces as the envelope of any occupied space does not produce good sound. The focussing effect of concave surfaces can cause high sound pressure levels, coloration, and echoes. However, throughout history there have been many enclosed rooms with large curved surfaces as envelopes that seem to produce good acoustics. Recent research suggested that wave analysis must be undertaken to establish the impact of concave surfaces. In contrast to Part I of the current investigation, evaluation of the sound pressure level distribution, in rooms with concave surfaces, was performed by solving the governing wave equation. The main reason is that the image-ray theory is valid only at frequencies greater than the Schroeder cut-off frequency. The wave theory is used for frequencies lower than 100 Hz. Finite element modelling was applied to solve for the sound pressure level distribution within rooms with concave surfaces. Three spaces, the Paul Crocker Gallery in Ryerson University, Toronto, St. Pauls Anglican Church in Toronto and Wigmore Hall in London were investigated in this study. The results for three low frequencies (25 Hz, 50 Hz, and 100 Hz) as well as their combination will be presented in this paper.
Skip Nav Destination
,
Article navigation
September 2018
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
September 01 2018
Concave surfaces and acoustics of performance spaces—Part II —Wave analysis Free
Ramani Ramakrishnan;
Ramani Ramakrishnan
Architectural Sci., Ryerson Univ., 325 Victoria St., Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Eva M. Johnston-Iafelice
Eva M. Johnston-Iafelice
Architectural Sci., Ryerson Univ., 325 Victoria St., Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Ramani Ramakrishnan
Eva M. Johnston-Iafelice
Architectural Sci., Ryerson Univ., 325 Victoria St., Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada, [email protected]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 144, 1951–1952 (2018)
Citation
Ramani Ramakrishnan, Eva M. Johnston-Iafelice; Concave surfaces and acoustics of performance spaces—Part II —Wave analysis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 September 2018; 144 (3_Supplement): 1951–1952. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5068533
Download citation file:
40
Views
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Drawer-like tunable ventilated sound barrier
Yong Ge, Yi-jun Guan, et al.
Related Content
Concave surfaces and acoustics of performance spaces—Part I— Hybrid ray-image analysis
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (September 2018)
Outdoor oratory and performance space
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2015)
Computer simulation of Benjamin Franklin's acoustic experiment on George Whitefield's oratory
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (September 2012)
Acoustics at the shrine of St. Werburgh
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2004)
The booming party walls being constructed in the skyscrapers of Toronto
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2023)