The present report describes a version of the MALD (Massive Auditory Lexical Decision) database which investigates listener performance in the often crowded TELUS World of Science—Edmonton (TWOSE) on tablets with headphones, with most participants experiencing varying levels of uncontrolled distraction. A total of 533 listeners participated in the experiment (ages 4–86; 51% female; 81.8% native English). Stimuli were a randomly selected subset of 2000 words and 2000 pseudowords extracted from the MALD project (Tucker et al., 2018), recorded by a single speaker. The stimuli were further randomly divided into 20 lists, each containing 100 words and 100 pseudowords, with no practice stimuli. Each participant was presented with a single list, with the entire experimental session usually lasting between five and ten minutes. TWOSE-MALD participants, unsurprisingly, perform worse than listeners in a laboratory setting in terms of both accuracy and response latencies. The relationship between the standard predictors and response latency remains the same. We also find age related effects indicating that accuracy increases rapidly (from ages 4 to 14) and slowly plateaus, while response latencies rapidly decrease until participants reach their early twenties, after which a steady increase is noted as participants’ age increases.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2018
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
September 01 2018
Auditory lexical decision in the wild
Benjamin V. Tucker;
Benjamin V. Tucker
Linguist, Univ. of AB, 4-32 Assiniboia Hall, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E7, Canada, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Filip Nenadic;
Filip Nenadic
Linguist, Univ. of AB, 4-32 Assiniboia Hall, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E7, Canada, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Matthew C. Kelley
Matthew C. Kelley
Linguist, Univ. of AB, 4-32 Assiniboia Hall, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E7, Canada, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 144, 1799–1800 (2018)
Citation
Benjamin V. Tucker, Filip Nenadic, Matthew C. Kelley; Auditory lexical decision in the wild. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 September 2018; 144 (3_Supplement): 1799–1800. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5067940
Download citation file:
62
Views
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Performance study of ray-based ocean acoustic tomography methods for estimating submesoscale variability in the upper ocean
Etienne Ollivier, Richard X. Touret, et al.
Related Content
The massive auditory lexical decision database: Acoustic analyses of a large-scale, single speaker corpus
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2020)
Speaker-listener dialect differences and spoken word recognition: Evidence from massive auditory lexical decision
J Acoust Soc Am (March 2019)
Computational modeling of human isolated auditory word recognition using DIANA
J Acoust Soc Am (October 2017)
Correlates of word likeness in the perception of pseudowords
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2023)
Reducing phonetically incomplete application of tone three sandhi to articulatory implementation
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2020)