In a previous experiment [McCloy and Lee, 2013, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134, 4230 (2013)], we reported an asymmetry between phonetic and semantic detection tasks with respect to spatially separated vs. spatially adjacent attended word streams: phonetic tasks showed high false alarm rates when to-be-attended streams were spatially divided, while semantic tasks did not. In this experiment, we manipulate the difficulty of the semantic task to investigate the effect of cognitive load on task performance. We compare trials in which the two to-be-attended streams comprise words drawn from either one or two semantic categories, and from categories with either a small or large number of words. Effects of these manipulations on target hit rate and false alarm rate are discussed in relation to previous work.
Skip Nav Destination
,
Article navigation
April 2014
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
April 01 2014
Effects of cognitive load on selective and divided auditory spatial attention
Daniel McCloy;
Daniel McCloy
Inst. for Learning and Brain Sci., Univ. of Washington, Box 357988, Seattle, WA 98115-7988, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Adrian KC Lee
Adrian KC Lee
Speech and Hearing Sci., Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA
Search for other works by this author on:
Daniel McCloy
Adrian KC Lee
Inst. for Learning and Brain Sci., Univ. of Washington, Box 357988, Seattle, WA 98115-7988, [email protected]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 135, 2280 (2014)
Citation
Daniel McCloy, Adrian KC Lee; Effects of cognitive load on selective and divided auditory spatial attention. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 April 2014; 135 (4_Supplement): 2280. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4877473
Download citation file:
86
Views
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
Related Content
Auditory attention strategy depends on target linguistic properties and spatial configuration
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (July 2015)
Acoustic characteristics of aspirated fricatives in a Tibeto-Burman language
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (March 2019)
On the distinction between prosodic and semantic factors in word identification
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)
Impaired speech recognition under a cognitive load: Where is the locus?
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2013)
Phonemes, intensity and attention: Differential effects on the mismatch negativity (MMN)
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (December 1999)