Real (Stevens et al., 1966) and virtual F2 locus (Sussman et al., 1991) measures are presented for Malayalam lingual plosives. We show that in distinguishing voiceless coronals (dental, alveolar, and retroflex) in VCːV sequences, F2 onsets derived from first-order locus equations (LEs) show only partial delineation of the contrast. The dental-alveolar contrast is effectively maintained, but retroflex and alveolar stops show no significant difference in F2 onset. Following Lindblom and Sussman’s (2012) examination of LEs as a measure of relative coarticulatory resistance, we report F2 slopes for the three coronal stops in VC and CV transitions to assess the implications of this metric in Malayalam. Our findings on the ordering of slope values from steepest to flattest did not follow predictions based on expectations of relative articulatory complexity; namely, alveolars generated a flatter slope than retroflexes, despite Dart and Nihalani’s (1999) demonstration that the retroflex gesture is more complex within the coronals. These results, when compared with temporal measures from exponential models of formant trajectories at consonant implosion and release (i.e., transition velocity and projected F2 locus), suggest a necessary distinction between coarticulation-based place of articulation categorization and formant transition cues utilized in maintaining stop place contrasts.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 2013
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
November 01 2013
Coarticulation and contrast in static and dynamic models of second formant trajectories
Indranil Dutta;
Indranil Dutta
Dept. of Computational Linguist., The English and Foreign Lang. Univ., Tarnaka, Osmania University Campus, Hyderabad 500605, India, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Charlie Redmon
Charlie Redmon
School of Lang. Sci., The English and Foreign Lang. Univ., Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134, 4203 (2013)
Citation
Indranil Dutta, Charlie Redmon; Coarticulation and contrast in static and dynamic models of second formant trajectories. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 November 2013; 134 (5_Supplement): 4203. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4831424
Download citation file:
76
Views
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Rapid detection of fish calls within diverse coral reef soundscapes using a convolutional neural network
Seth McCammon, Nathan Formel, et al.
Related Content
Articulatory tongue shape analysis of Mandarin alveolar–retroflex contrast
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2020)
Manner and place differences in Kannada coronal consonants: Articulatory and acoustic results
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (December 2018)
A formant study of the alveolar versus retroflex contrast in three Central Australian languages: Stop, nasal, and lateral manners of articulation
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2020)
Locus equations and coarticulation in three Australian languages
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (February 2015)