Sound-level errors collected by ear from continuous communicative speech have been interpreted as mis-selections of planning elements, which are then produced fluently without residue of the original target (Lashley 1957, Fromkin 1972, Garrett 1975, Shattuck-Hufnagel 1982). In contrast, articulatory measures of tongue twister errors reveal gestural intrusions: target and intrusion elements are co-produced, sometimes resulting in a gestural error which is imperceptible to listeners (Pouplier 2003, Goldstein et al. 2007; see also Mowrey and MacKay 1970). Is this apparent difference due to structure and processing differences between the two utterance types, i.e., sentences (e.g., The top cop saw a cop top) vs alternating repetitive word lists (e.g., top cop top cop top cop) generally produced with quasi-periodic timing? Or, do articulatory measures simply capture the nature of sound-level errors more accurately? We elicited errors using both types of stimuli in the same experimental session; perceptual and acoustic analyses show that sentences provoke more apparent whole-segment substitutions (e.g., /tap/ for /kap/), while alternating repetitive lists provoke more errors with two onset bursts (e.g., /tkap/), resembling gestural intrusions. This suggests that there may be more than one mechanism underlying spoken errors, and that different materials may engage these mechanisms to different degrees.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
,
,
Article navigation
November 2013
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
November 01 2013
A comparison of speech errors elicited by sentences and alternating repetitive tongue twisters Free
Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel;
Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel
Speech Commun., MIT, 36-511 MIT, 77 Mass Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Argyro Katsikis;
Argyro Katsikis
Univ. of Potsdam, Potsdam, Poland
Search for other works by this author on:
Marianne Pouplier;
Marianne Pouplier
Univ. of Munich, Munich, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Louis Goldstein
Louis Goldstein
USC, Los Angeles, CA
Search for other works by this author on:
Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel
Cathy Bai
Mark Tiede
Argyro Katsikis
Marianne Pouplier
Louis Goldstein
Speech Commun., MIT, 36-511 MIT, 77 Mass Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, [email protected]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134, 4166 (2013)
Citation
Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel, Cathy Bai, Mark Tiede, Argyro Katsikis, Marianne Pouplier, Louis Goldstein; A comparison of speech errors elicited by sentences and alternating repetitive tongue twisters. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 November 2013; 134 (5_Supplement): 4166. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4831271
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
Drawer-like tunable ventilated sound barrier
Yong Ge, Yi-jun Guan, et al.
Related Content
Phonemic errors are not always categorical: Articulatory evidence
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2002)
Phonetic variability in /s/ and /z/ segment errors: A multitalker acoustic study
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 1997)
Acoustic evidence for featural and subfeatural errors in speech production
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 1997)
Phonological primitives: Electromyographic speech error evidence
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (September 1990)
Position constraints on interacting segments in elicited errors favor the word over the stressed syllable
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)