Specialized equipment and techniques are required to carry out direct sound measurements under occluded ears for the purpose of assessing the noise exposure from communication headsets. Standard ISO 11904 describes two procedures: (1) the microphone in a real ear (MIRE) and (2) the acoustic manikin technique using an occluded ear simulator IEC 60318-4. Methods using simpler artificial ears, such as IEC 60318-1, have also been proposed in occupational noise measurement standards such as CAN/CSA Z107.56. Such devices are more practical to use and more easily accessible. However, they have not been designed specifically for noise measurements under communication headsets and there is little comparative data to the manikin technique, which is considered the gold standard for simulated in-situ acoustic measurements. Furthermore, little is known about measurement reliability for the purpose of standardization. Fit-refit measurements were obtained under laboratory conditions with four different types of artificial ears (type 1, type 2, type 3.3, manikin), three communication headset types (circum-aural, supra-aural, intra-aural) and six different communication signals. Data was transformed into equivalent-diffuse sound levels using third-octave procedures as well as single number corrections. Results illustrate that methods using single number corrections as well as fit-refit standard deviations vary according to measurement conditions.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
May 2013
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
May 01 2013
Comparison of direct measurement methods for headset noise exposure in the workplace Free
Flora Nassrallah;
Flora Nassrallah
Population Health, Univ. of Ottawa, 1 Stewart St., Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Christian Giguère;
Christian Giguère
Audiol./SLP Program, Univ. of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Hilmi R. Dajani
Hilmi R. Dajani
School of Elec. Eng. and Comput. Sci., Univ. of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Flora Nassrallah
Population Health, Univ. of Ottawa, 1 Stewart St., Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, [email protected]
Christian Giguère
Audiol./SLP Program, Univ. of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Hilmi R. Dajani
School of Elec. Eng. and Comput. Sci., Univ. of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133, 3594 (2013)
Citation
Flora Nassrallah, Christian Giguère, Hilmi R. Dajani; Comparison of direct measurement methods for headset noise exposure in the workplace. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 May 2013; 133 (5_Supplement): 3594. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4806642
Download citation file:
83
Views
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Variation in global and intonational pitch settings among black and white speakers of Southern American English
Aini Li, Ruaridh Purse, et al.
Related Content
Comparison of direct measurement methods for headset noise exposure in the workplace
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. (May 2013)
An indirect calculation method for estimating occupational sound exposure from communication headsets
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (February 2019)
Evaluation of a calculation method of noise exposure from communication headsets
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2017)
Validation of the CSA Z107,56 standard method for the measurement of noise exposure from headsets
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2013)
Noise reduction ratings of active noise cancellation headsets
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2016)