At least since 1975 the “pleasantness” of a sound is discussed from many different angles (Ely 1975; Aures 1984; Halpern etal. 1986; Vaschillo 2003; Neumann & Waters 2006; Cox 2008), but often chalkboard squeaking or scratching a chalkboard with finger nails tops the list of unpleasant sounds. The aim of the presented study is to detect specific parts of the sounds that make chalkboard squeaking particularly unpleasant. With a combination of perception experiments and electro-physiological measurements, it was analyzed to what extent the knowledge about the sounds influenced the subjects' judgments and/or the physiological reactions. Basically the study is a replication of Halpern etal. (1986), whose methods were extended by several sophisticated sound analysis and re-synthesis techniques and the measurement of some electro-physiological parameters (heart rate and skin resistance) during listening. First results show that especially the modification of the tonal parts as well as applying a filter between 2000 and 4000 Hz led to a more pleasant sound perception. Almost all stimuli were rated more unpleasant if the subjects knew about the nature of the sounds.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2011
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
October 01 2011
Psychoacoustics of chalkboard squeaking
Christoph Reuter;
Christoph Reuter
Musicological Inst., Univ. of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael Oehler
Michael Oehler
Univ. of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130, 2545 (2011)
Citation
Christoph Reuter, Michael Oehler; Psychoacoustics of chalkboard squeaking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 2011; 130 (4_Supplement): 2545. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3655174
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) use multiple auditory mechanisms for detecting tonal signals in natural and anthropogenic noise
J Acoust Soc Am (October 2011)
Can ABR latency measures predict psychoacoustic performance?
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing‐impaired listeners
J Acoust Soc Am (September 1982)
The dawn of psychoacoustics in Japan
J Acoust Soc Am (May 2017)
Need for standardization of psychoacoustics.
J Acoust Soc Am (March 2010)