The current study examined whether non‐native listeners’ perception is facilitated by a match between their L1 and the accent with which L2 words are pronounced. An auditory lexical decision task was used, where English words and nonwords were pronounced by a native speaker of English or a native speaker of Mexican Spanish. Half the words were cognates (overlapping in phonetic form and meaning across languages) while half were noncognates. Spanish‐English bilinguals from Mexico and English‐speaking monolinguals listened to accented and nonaccented stimuli and decided as quickly as possible whether they were English words. Results indicate an effect of lexical status and accent in both listener groups, with faster reaction times (RTs) for words than nonwords, and slower RTs on accented than nonaccented stimuli. However, English‐speaking monolinguals were slower than Spanish‐English bilinguals in recognizing accented English words. Moreover, Spanish‐English bilinguals demonstrated faster RTs for cognates than for noncognates, but only when these were spoken with a Spanish accent. Results indicate that non‐native accent influences auditory processing even in listeners who are familiar with the particular accent. Further, cognate effects indicate that lexical‐phonological variables interact with acoustical factors in determining the efficiency with which the bilingual lexical system processes auditory information.
Skip Nav Destination
,
Article navigation
April 2011
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
April 01 2011
Accent effects in auditory processing by native and non‐native speakers.
Kristin Franco;
Kristin Franco
Univ. of Wisconsin‐Madison, Madison WI 53705
Search for other works by this author on:
Margarita Kaushanskaya
Margarita Kaushanskaya
Univ. of Wisconsin‐Madison, Madison WI 53705
Search for other works by this author on:
Kristin Franco
Margarita Kaushanskaya
Univ. of Wisconsin‐Madison, Madison WI 53705
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, 2659 (2011)
Citation
Kristin Franco, Margarita Kaushanskaya; Accent effects in auditory processing by native and non‐native speakers.. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 April 2011; 129 (4_Supplement): 2659. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3588885
Download citation file:
87
Views
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
Speed-dependent directivity patterns of road-traffic vehicles
Christian Dreier, Michael Vorländer
Related Content
The impact of phonetic dissimilarity on the perception of foreign accented speech
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2003)
Perception of acoustic cues to Tokyo Japanese pitch-accent contrasts in native Japanese and naive English listeners
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (July 2015)
Perception of contrastive bi-syllabic lexical stress in unaccented and accented words by younger and older listeners
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (March 2016)
On the role of phonetic inventory in the perception of foreign‐accented speech
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2002)
Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (December 2004)