The possibility that selective auditory attention can affect the responses of the cochlea via the medial olivocochlear (MOC) pathway was investigated in human listeners using a nonlinear version of the stimulus‐frequency otoacoustic emission (SFOAE), called the nSFOAE [Walsh et al. (2010)]. During nSFOAE recording, listeners attended to one of two competing speech streams, each composed of seven randomly‐selected spoken digits that were interleaved with the nSFOAE stimuli. The talker was female in one ear and male in the other (randomized across trials). The task of the listener was to match a subset of the digits spoken by the female talker to one of two choices presented visually on a computer screen. The nSFOAE stimulus was a tone (4.0 kHz, 200 ms) presented simultaneously to the two ears, either in quiet (tone‐alone) or in noise (tone‐plus‐noise). When nSFOAEs were measured during periods of selective attention, the tone‐plus‐noise responses exhibited larger maximum magnitudes, and larger changes from the tone‐alone magnitudes, compared to the responses measured during a no‐attention condition, in which the competing speech streams were presented, but with no digit‐matching required. The differences in magnitudes across conditions were as much as 4–5 dB. [Work supported by the NIDCD.]
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
April 2011
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
April 01 2011
Cochlear measures of selective auditory attention. Free
Kyle P. Walsh;
Kyle P. Walsh
Dept. of Psych. & Ctr. for Perceptual Systems, The Univ. of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station A8000, Austin, TX 78712, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Edward G. Pasanen;
Edward G. Pasanen
Dept. of Psych. & Ctr. for Perceptual Systems, The Univ. of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station A8000, Austin, TX 78712, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Dennis McFadden
Dennis McFadden
Dept. of Psych. & Ctr. for Perceptual Systems, The Univ. of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station A8000, Austin, TX 78712, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Kyle P. Walsh
Dept. of Psych. & Ctr. for Perceptual Systems, The Univ. of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station A8000, Austin, TX 78712, [email protected]
Edward G. Pasanen
Dept. of Psych. & Ctr. for Perceptual Systems, The Univ. of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station A8000, Austin, TX 78712, [email protected]
Dennis McFadden
Dept. of Psych. & Ctr. for Perceptual Systems, The Univ. of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station A8000, Austin, TX 78712, [email protected]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, 2593 (2011)
Citation
Kyle P. Walsh, Edward G. Pasanen, Dennis McFadden; Cochlear measures of selective auditory attention.. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 April 2011; 129 (4_Supplement): 2593. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3588588
Download citation file:
59
Views
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Variation in global and intonational pitch settings among black and white speakers of Southern American English
Aini Li, Ruaridh Purse, et al.
Related Content
Changes in otoacoustic emissions during selective auditory and visual attention
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2015)
Selective auditory or visual attention reduces physiological noise in the ear canals of human subjects
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. (May 2013)
Properties of a nonlinear version of the stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (February 2010)
Does the efferent system aid with selective attention?
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2014)
Selective auditory or visual attention reduces physiological noise in the ear canals of human subjects
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2013)