Successful speech recognition requires that listeners map acoustically variant pronunciations onto the same meaningful interpretation. As listeners are exposed to a talker’s speech, they learn the relevant mapping, and their perception shifts to accommodate the talker’s pronunciations. Recent work on the perceptual learning of idiolectal variation has made it possible to investigate precisely what it is that changes in perceptual processing as listeners adapt to speakers. These studies suggest that phonemic representations themselves are rapidly modified to reflect the idiolectal variants produced by a talker. However, dialectal variation appears to be handled differently. Several studies will be presented that address the representation of dialectal forms, including a recent experiment that directly compared learning of a dialectal variant to learning of an idiolectal variant with the same acoustic properties. Listeners adjust to talkers’ dialects, but unlike with idiolectal variation, such adjustments do not reflect an underlying modification of the phonemic representations of the canonical counterparts. The implication of these results for dialect representation, as well as for the perceptual learning process, will be discussed. [This work was supported by NIH NRSA Award No. 7 F32 HD052342‐03.]
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2009
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
October 06 2009
How listeners represent dialectal variation.
Tanya Kraljic
Tanya Kraljic
Dept. of Psych., Univ. of Pennsylvania, 3401 Walnut St., Ste. 400A, Philadelphia, PA 19104, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 2282 (2009)
Citation
Tanya Kraljic; How listeners represent dialectal variation.. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 2009; 126 (4_Supplement): 2282. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3249354
Download citation file:
57
Views
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Does sound symbolism need sound?: The role of articulatory movement in detecting iconicity between sound and meaning
Mutsumi Imai, Sotaro Kita, et al.
Related Content
On idiolectal differences in speaking rate: A comparison of spontaneous and read speech
J Acoust Soc Am (May 2000)
Talker‐specific accent: Can speech alignment reveal idiolectic influences during the perception of accented speech?
J Acoust Soc Am (March 2010)
A search for listener differences in the perception of talker identity
J Acoust Soc Am (October 2004)
Lexically mediated perceptual learning generalizes to new word positions
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2014)
Measuring sensitivity to short‐term deviations in acoustic cue correlation.
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2009)