Remote methods for classifying age, sex, group membership, or individual identification of animals that live in visually obscured environments are extremely valuable tools for field biologists, but reliable identification of individual callers still presents important challenges. Acoustic features of animal vocalizations can be processed to extract caller identification using a variety of sophisticated classification techniques, but the exact classification process can be difficult to justify rigorously and challenging to repeat on novel data. A feature extraction and classification process that is clear, simple, and repeatable would be a major benefit to wildlife studies. Classification and regression trees (CART) generate intuitive and clear processes for handling multidimensional acoustic information. Examples of CART applied to Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalus lucida) and humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) vocalizations will be provided. These CART results will be compared to other classification techniques, particularly neural networks. CART performance was comparable, but had the advantage that it yielded explicit classifiers used to categorize vocalizations, making it easy to integrate into acoustic surveying systems. This promises to be a valuable tool for conservation and management of these and other endangered species.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
Article navigation
April 2009
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
April 08 2009
Processing acoustic features of animal vocalizations using classification procedures. Free
Sean F. Hanser;
Sean F. Hanser
Dept. of Vet Med. Population Health and Reproduction, Univ. of California, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Brenda McCowan;
Brenda McCowan
Dept. of Vet Med. Population Health and Reproduction, Univ. of California, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Laurance R. Doyle;
Laurance R. Doyle
SETI Inst., Mountain View, CA 94043
Search for other works by this author on:
Ann E. Bowles
Ann E. Bowles
Hubbs‐SeaWorld Res. Inst., San Diego, CA 92109
Search for other works by this author on:
Sean F. Hanser
Brenda McCowan
Laurance R. Doyle
Ann E. Bowles
Dept. of Vet Med. Population Health and Reproduction, Univ. of California, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, [email protected]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 2740 (2009)
Citation
Sean F. Hanser, Brenda McCowan, Laurance R. Doyle, Ann E. Bowles; Processing acoustic features of animal vocalizations using classification procedures.. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 April 2009; 125 (4_Supplement): 2740. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4784550
Download citation file:
67
Views
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Variation in global and intonational pitch settings among black and white speakers of Southern American English
Aini Li, Ruaridh Purse, et al.
Related Content
Effects of helicopter noise on spotted owls: Methodology
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 1995)
Remote infrared acoustically triggered video monitoring unit
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 2000)
Response of nonbreeding spotted owls to helicopter and chain saw noise.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 1996)
Acoustic model adaptation for ortolan bunting (Emberiza hortulana L.) song-type classification
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (March 2008)