All hearing aids and cochlea implants have algorithm to improve the speech intelligibility. The idea is to share human speech and noise to find different ratings. The result should be easier to understand by impaired people. On the market there are big efforts to recognize speech and to separate it from noise. In this field we can notice a remarkable progress in the last years. But the reverberant sound in rooms or noise from same direction like the signal need a lot of work to suppress them effective. The simplest way seems to be to gets the original speech signal direct from the source and to processes it individual in hearing devices. Induction loop systems as well as wireless infrared or radio frequency systems are used in churches, cinemas, theatres and conference rooms. But the available systems are very different in costs and benefit for management and clients. If these systems are used there is a considerable improvement of speech intelligibility. The presentation will show the level of most used external audio hearing systems, their possibilities to improve the signal to noise ratio, the speech transmission index (STI) and the benefit for hearing aid or cochlear implant users.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
May 2008
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
May 01 2008
Improvement of speech intelligibility by audio hearing systems Free
Hannes Seidler
Hannes Seidler
Clinic of ORL, Dept. of Medicine, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany, Hannes.Seidler@tu‐dresden.de
Search for other works by this author on:
Hannes Seidler
Clinic of ORL, Dept. of Medicine, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany, Hannes.Seidler@tu‐dresden.de
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 3235 (2008)
Citation
Hannes Seidler; Improvement of speech intelligibility by audio hearing systems. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 May 2008; 123 (5_Supplement): 3235. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2933473
Download citation file:
120
Views
Citing articles via
Climatic and economic fluctuations revealed by decadal ocean soundscapes
Vanessa M. ZoBell, Natalie Posdaljian, et al.
Variation in global and intonational pitch settings among black and white speakers of Southern American English
Aini Li, Ruaridh Purse, et al.
The contribution of speech rate, rhythm, and intonation to perceived non-nativeness in a speaker's native language
Ulrich Reubold, Robert Mayr, et al.
Related Content
Real‐time 3D audio for digital cinema
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2008)
A metric for predicting binaural speech intelligibility in stationary noise and competing speech maskers
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (September 2016)
Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2016)
Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2009)
Effect of hearing‐aid microphone location on the intelligibility of hearing‐aid transduced speech
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)