ASTM E336 and ISO 140 define several metrics describing airborne sound isolation for field measurements of wall and floor/ceiling assemblies. The current standards include provisions for the measurements of an apparent sound power reduction (ASTC and R'w), a non‐normalized noise reduction (NIC and Dn,w), and a normalized noise reduction (NNIC and DnT,w). In a previous paper [LoVerde and Dong, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 3219 (2006)], the relationships between these metrics were reviewed. The desired metric for isolation in residential uses is discussed, specifically whether it should be based on sound power and related to the performance of the partition system (ASTC and R'w), or based on sound pressure and related to the acoustic isolation between spaces (NNIC or NIC or ISO equivalents). The analysis indicates that the sound pressure‐based metric is preferred. Since power and pressure‐based airborne sound metrics have small differences in field tested assemblies in most cases, it appears engineers have assumed that ASTC (and R'w) correlates with isolation. Field tests where this assumption does not hold are presented. In these cases, the power metric provides an inaccurate assessment of the acoustic isolation and can lead to engineering evaluations inconsistent with actual performance.
Skip Nav Destination
,
Article navigation
May 2008
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
May 01 2008
Evaluation of Metrics for Field Airborne Sound Isolation
Wayland Dong;
Wayland Dong
Veneklasen Associates, 1711 Sixteenth Street, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
John Loverde
John Loverde
Veneklasen Associates, 1711 Sixteenth Street, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Wayland Dong
John Loverde
Veneklasen Associates, 1711 Sixteenth Street, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA, [email protected]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 3190 (2008)
Citation
Wayland Dong, John Loverde; Evaluation of Metrics for Field Airborne Sound Isolation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 May 2008; 123 (5_Supplement): 3190. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2933314
Download citation file:
67
Views
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
Related Content
Field airborne sound isolation in multifamily construction evaluation of metrics within ASTM E336
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2006)
The use and application of pressure-based acoustical metrics adopted within the International Building Code
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2022)
Predictability of field airborne noise isolation from laboratory testing.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (March 2010)
Field impact insulation testing: Inadequacy of existing normalization methods and proposal for new ratings analogous to those for airborne noise reduction
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)
Field normalization techniques and practices for determining sound isolation and impact insulation
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2003)