During acoustic lure surveys for birds, topography and ambient noise are likely to be important determinants of detectability. Examinations of propagation were conducted for acoustic lures (human‐made calls) and owl responses recorded during acoustic surveys for Mexican spotted owls in the Gila National Forest (2005). Lure surveys were designed based on formal agency protocols, which assumed a 0.43‐km detection range under typical conditions. A total of 558 points was called over a heavily forested, topographically complex 20×24‐km area. Real‐time measurements of owl calls and lures were made with a calibrated recording system. Ambient noise was collected using an array of 39 Larson‐Davis 820 and 824 sound‐level meters. The NMSIM (Wyle Laboratories) single‐event propagation simulator was used to model propagation of both owl and human calls. The resulting model of survey effort was compared with a simple two‐dimensional statistical model. Probability of detecting owls did not fit the expectations of the agency protocol, suggesting that acoustic propagation should be considered during owl surveys. [Work supported by U.S. Air Force ACC/CEVP; USFWS Permit No. TE024429]
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
,
,
Article navigation
November 2006
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
November 01 2006
Effective area of acoustic lure surveys for Mexican spotted owls (Strix occidentalis lucida)
Samuel L. Denes;
Samuel L. Denes
Hubbs‐SeaWorld Res. Inst., 2595 Ingraham St., San Diego, CA 92109
Search for other works by this author on:
Ann E. Bowles;
Ann E. Bowles
Hubbs‐SeaWorld Res. Inst., 2595 Ingraham St., San Diego, CA 92109
Search for other works by this author on:
Kenneth Plotkin;
Kenneth Plotkin
Wyle Labs., Arlington, VA 22202
Search for other works by this author on:
John Kern;
John Kern
Kern Statistical Services, Sauk Rapids, MN 56379
Search for other works by this author on:
Elizabeth Pruitt
Elizabeth Pruitt
GeoMarine, Inc., Hampton, VA 23666
Search for other works by this author on:
Samuel L. Denes
Ann E. Bowles
Kenneth Plotkin
Chris Hobbs
John Kern
Elizabeth Pruitt
Hubbs‐SeaWorld Res. Inst., 2595 Ingraham St., San Diego, CA 92109
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 3267 (2006)
Citation
Samuel L. Denes, Ann E. Bowles, Kenneth Plotkin, Chris Hobbs, John Kern, Elizabeth Pruitt; Effective area of acoustic lure surveys for Mexican spotted owls (Strix occidentalis lucida). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 November 2006; 120 (5_Supplement): 3267. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4776940
Download citation file:
72
Views
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
Related Content
Remote infrared acoustically triggered video monitoring unit
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 2000)
Processing acoustic features of animal vocalizations using classification procedures.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2009)
Assessing the relative importance of source distance determined by acoustic cues and noise level as predictors of disturbance in a study of the Mexican spotted owl
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 2006)
Reproductive success of Mexican spotted owls (Strix occidentalis lucida) in relation to common environmental noise ― biotic, non-military aircraft, and weather-related
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (September 2012)
Acoustic surveys for Mexican spotted owls (Strix occidentalis lucida): An analysis
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2002)