The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of the glottal geometry on intraglottal and transglottal pressures using a Plexiglas model and a commercially computational fluid dynamics code, fluent. Nine glottal angles (uniform, as well as convergent and divergent 5, 10, 20, and 40 deg), 18 inferior vocal‐fold angles varied from 87.5 to −10 deg, and 19 superior vocal‐fold surface angles varied from −85 to 45 deg for uniform, convergen 10‐ and divergent 10‐deg glottal angle, and a wide range of entrance radii varied from 0.26 to 0.005 cm for different divergent glottis were selected separately to examine their pressure distribution effects. The empirical data were supported by computational results using fluent. The results suggest that the 10‐deg divergence angle may correspond to least flow resistance, the vocal‐fold surface pressures are essentially independent of the inferior and superior vocal‐fold surface angles realistic for human phonation, and a small glottal entrance radius tends to lower the transglottal pressure, move the minimal pressure near the glottal entrance more upstream, and make the pressure dip more negative in value. These results suggest that the glottal geometry should be well specified when using physical, mathematical phonatory models.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2005
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
September 01 2005
The effects of the glottal geometry on intraglottal pressure distributions
Li Sheng;
Li Sheng
Dept. of Biomed. Eng. School of Life Sci. and Technol., Xi'an Jiaotong Univ., 28 West Xianning Rd., Xi'an, 71004R, P.R. China
Search for other works by this author on:
C. Ronald Scherer;
C. Ronald Scherer
Bowling Green State Univ., Bowling Green, OH 43403
Search for other works by this author on:
SuPin Wang
SuPin Wang
Xi'an Jiaotong Univ., China
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 2027 (2005)
Citation
Li Sheng, C. Ronald Scherer, MingXi Wan, SuPin Wang; The effects of the glottal geometry on intraglottal pressure distributions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 September 2005; 118 (3_Supplement): 2027. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4785783
Download citation file:
36
Views
Citing articles via
Vowel signatures in emotional interjections and nonlinguistic vocalizations expressing pain, disgust, and joy across languages
Maïa Ponsonnet, Christophe Coupé, et al.
The alveolar trill is perceived as jagged/rough by speakers of different languages
Aleksandra Ćwiek, Rémi Anselme, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
The effect of glottal angle on intraglottal pressure
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (January 2006)
The effect of entrance radii on intraglottal pressure distributions in the divergent glottis
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (February 2012)
The effect of exit radii on intraglottal pressure distributions in the convergent glottis
J Acoust Soc Am (November 2001)
Intraglottal pressure profiles for a symmetric and oblique glottis with a divergence angle of 10 degrees
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2001)
Intraglottal pressure distributions for oblique glottal angles
J Acoust Soc Am (May 2008)