Previous studies (Lee and Green, 1994; Lee and Bacon, 1997) suggested that both AM rate and AM depth discrimination were influenced by the number of AM cycles, instead of the duration of stimuli. AM detection and AM depth discrimination (standard depth=0.1) were measured as a function of the number of AM cycles for modulation rates of 10, 20, 40, 80, 125, 160, and 320 Hz. Different numbers of modulation cycles were used for each modulation rate: 2, 4, or 8 for 10 Hz; 2, 4, 8, or 16 for 20 Hz; 2, 4, 8, 16, or 32 for 40 Hz; 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, or 64 for 80, 125, 160, and 320 Hz. The carrier was a broadband‐noise (10 kHz lowpass), and the carrier was either gated with the modulator or presented 250 ms earlier and 250 ms later than the modulator. The overall level of each presentation was randomized within 6‐dB range from 65 dB SPL. The results suggest that there might be different temporal integration processes for AM detection and AM depth discrimination. The pattern is different for lower and higher modulation rates. [Work was supported by NIDCD Grant No. R03 DC06605‐01.]
Skip Nav Destination
,
Article navigation
April 2005
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
April 01 2005
Temporal integration functions of amplitude modulation detection and amplitude modulation depth discrimination
Jungmee Lee;
Jungmee Lee
Speech and Hearing Sci., The Grad. School and Univ. Ctr., The City Univ. of New York, 365 5th Ave., New York, NY 10016
Search for other works by this author on:
Glenis Long
Glenis Long
Speech and Hearing Sci., The Grad. School and Univ. Ctr., The City Univ. of New York, 365 5th Ave., New York, NY 10016
Search for other works by this author on:
Jungmee Lee
Glenis Long
Speech and Hearing Sci., The Grad. School and Univ. Ctr., The City Univ. of New York, 365 5th Ave., New York, NY 10016
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 2535 (2005)
Citation
Jungmee Lee, Glenis Long; Temporal integration functions of amplitude modulation detection and amplitude modulation depth discrimination. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 April 2005; 117 (4_Supplement): 2535. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4788418
Download citation file:
55
Views
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Temporal integration functions of amplitude modulation depth discrimination: can multiple‐looks model explain this
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2008)
Contribution of onset/offset information of modulation to amplitude modulation depth discrimination
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2008)
Temporal modulation transfer functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (June 2011)
Effect of duration on amplitude-modulation masking
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (June 2002)
Detection of amplitude modulation by normal‐hearing and hearing‐impaired subjects
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)