For 32 years of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) only the mechanical strength of shockwaves were of clinical interest. For use in orthopaedics, the absence of dangerous long term effects (malignant degeneration, etc.) is the only important message. The mechanical model tries to explain the effect of shock waves by the provocation of microleasions in the tissue stimulating repairing processes. First doubts on this mechanical model came up when Schaden (2001) could show, that less energy is more efficient in the treatment of non‐unions. Due to the basic research of the last years knowledge increased about the microbiological effects. Under the influence of shock waves the change of permeability of cell membranes and the liberation of free radicals was reported. Also the production of nitric oxide (NO) and different growth factors like vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP), transforming growth factor‐beta 1 (TGF‐b1), insulin‐like growth factor‐I (IGF‐I) etc. was observed. The biological model tries to explain the effect of shock waves by stimulating the ingrowth of blood vessels and liberation of growth factors. Under the influence of shock waves, biological tissues seem to be able to produce important substances to initiate healing processes.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
April 2005
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
April 01 2005
Working mechanism of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in non‐urological disciplines Free
Wolfgang Schaden
Wolfgang Schaden
Landstrasser Hauptstrasse 83, Vienna 1030, Austria
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 2384 (2005)
Citation
Wolfgang Schaden; Working mechanism of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in non‐urological disciplines. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 April 2005; 117 (4_Supplement): 2384. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4785679
Download citation file:
81
Views
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Drawer-like tunable ventilated sound barrier
Yong Ge, Yi-jun Guan, et al.
Related Content
Different shock front characteristics for non‐urological treatments
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2005)
Characterization of the acoustic field of a clinical electromagnetic shockwave therapy device.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2011)
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for non‐unions and delayed fracture healing
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2005)
Comparative quantitative assessment of serum soluble fas and fasl between urological tumor patients and healthy donors
AIP Conf. Proc. (October 2022)
ESWL—The evaluation of a revolution
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 1998)