Linguistic experience systematically affects speech perception, specifically for non‐native phonemes and contrasts. Native language influences are strong in adults, and emerge in infancy. Several theoretical models of non‐native speech perception have been proposed, including the Perceptual Assimilation Model (PAM: Best), Speech Learning Model (LSM: Flege), and Native Language Magnet model (NLM: Kuhl). Findings that infants learn statistical distributions of phoneme sequences, and phonetic details, converge on the notion that exposure to specific phonetic patterns affects the perception of phonological structure. A reasonable extrapolation is that perception of even native utterances should be influenced by their pronunciation with either familiar or unfamiliar phonetic structure. That is, if a listener is inexperienced with a given foreign accent, or another native language dialect, perception should be predictably affected when native phonemes/words are produced with those accents. This issue has received modest research attention, which has focused on sentences/words rather than phonemes. Findings suggest that unfamiliar accents do reduce recognition and intelligibility of native sentences and words. The implications of non‐native speech models, particularly PAM and SLM, for understanding and studying the impact of foreign accent on perception of native phonemes and contrasts, as well as longer utterances, will be discussed. [Work supported by NIH.]
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2004
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
October 01 2004
Theoretical models of non‐native speech perception: Implications for perception of foreign‐accented speech
Catherine Best
Catherine Best
MARCS Auditory Labs., Univ. Western Sydney, Penrith NSW 1797 Australia, and Haskins Labs., 270 Crown St., New Haven, CT 06511
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 2603 (2004)
Citation
Catherine Best; Theoretical models of non‐native speech perception: Implications for perception of foreign‐accented speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 2004; 116 (4_Supplement): 2603. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4785383
Download citation file:
112
Views
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Why do non‐native speakers have a foreign accent? A three‐dimensional perspective
J Acoust Soc Am (October 2004)
Foreign-accent discrimination with words and sentences
J Acoust Soc Am (October 2014)
Effects of listener experience with foreign accent on perception of accentedness and speaker age.
J Acoust Soc Am (March 2010)
General adaptation to accented English: Speech intelligibility unaffected by perceived source of non-native accent
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2021)
Speaker-independent factors affecting the perception of foreign accent in a second language
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2007)