After years of research on laboratory‐generated complex sounds, in the early 1990s Chuck Watson and colleagues in the Hearing and Communications Laboratory (HCL) became interested in whether sounds with some meaning to the listener were processed differently by the auditory system. So began in his lab a program of environmental sounds research, in the meticulous, deliberate manner Watson was known for. The first step was developing an addition to the Test of Basic Auditory Capabilities (TBAC) which would measure individual differences in the identification of familiar environmental sounds. Next came the psychophysical basics: detection and identification in noise. Then, borrowing a page from early speech researchers, the effects of low‐, high‐, and bandpass filtering on environmental sounds were investigated, as well as those of processing environmental sounds using vocoder methods. Work has continued outside the HCL on developing a standardized canon of environmental sounds for generalized testing, with an aim to creating diagnostic tests for environmental sounds similar to the SPIN and modified rhyme and reverberation (MRRT).
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
May 2004
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
May 01 2004
Studying environmental sounds the Watson way
Brian Gygi
Brian Gygi
East Bay Inst. for Res. and Education, 150 Muir Rd., Martinez, CA 94553
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 2574 (2004)
Citation
Brian Gygi; Studying environmental sounds the Watson way. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 May 2004; 115 (5_Supplement): 2574. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4809345
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Rapid detection of fish calls within diverse coral reef soundscapes using a convolutional neural network
Seth McCammon, Nathan Formel, et al.
Related Content
‘‘Watson, come here!’’
J Acoust Soc Am (May 2004)
Auditory temporal and reading disability
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Chuck Watson’s ‘‘differential psychoacoustics:’’ Individual differences in auditory abilities
J Acoust Soc Am (May 2004)
Low commonality between tests of auditory discrimination and of speech perception
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Individual differences in auditory abilities among normal‐hearing listeners
J Acoust Soc Am (November 2000)