I met and started working with C. S. Watson on or about the Fall of 1958. Even then there was usually a pause and a wind‐up before he made a point, usually neither concise nor terse. But once made, a point would be repeated and repeated. These oft‐repeated points transform and become ‘‘Watson’s Precepts.’’ Several such precepts, related to the study of speech perception by the hearing‐impaired, will be quoted or paraphrased and their significance illustrated with samples from his work or that of others. Included on the list are the following. ‘‘Bryan and Harter found that learning to perceive Morse Code continued over many hundreds of hours of practice. Training in many auditory tasks may require similar investments of practice time.’’ ‘‘One must distinguish response proclivities and sensory capabilities and tasks with low‐ or high‐uncertainty stimulus conditions.’’ ‘‘Psychoacoustic measures, other than the audiogram, don’t correlate with speech perception measures.’’ Finally, it will be revealed how this collection of ‘‘precepts’’ has led to his current views of speech perception by the hearing impaired and to our current collaboration on auditory training for the hearing‐aid users which features extensive practice and transition from low‐ to high‐uncertainty stimulus conditions.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
May 2004
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
May 01 2004
Learning about hearing by listening to Charles S. Watson for 45 years Free
James D. Miller
James D. Miller
Dept. of Otolaryngol., Box 8115, Washington Univ. School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., Saint Louis, MO 63110
Search for other works by this author on:
James D. Miller
Dept. of Otolaryngol., Box 8115, Washington Univ. School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., Saint Louis, MO 63110
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 2573 (2004)
Citation
James D. Miller; Learning about hearing by listening to Charles S. Watson for 45 years. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 May 2004; 115 (5_Supplement): 2573. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4809255
Download citation file:
53
Views
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Drawer-like tunable ventilated sound barrier
Yong Ge, Yi-jun Guan, et al.
Related Content
‘‘Watson, come here!’’
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2004)
The role of stimulus uncertainty in speech perception
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2004)
Understanding response proclivity and the limits of sensory capability: What do we hear and what can we hear?
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2004)
Chuck Watson’s ‘‘differential psychoacoustics:’’ Individual differences in auditory abilities
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2004)
Individual differences in speech and nonspeech processing among normal‐hearing subjects
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 1995)