Statistical analysis of data variability in speech production research has traditionally been addressed with the assumption of normally distributed error terms. The correct and valid application of statistical procedure requires a thorough investigation of the assumptions that underlie the methodology. In previous work [Kollia and Jorgenson, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102 (1997); 109 (2002)], it was shown that the error terms of speech production data in a linear regression can be modeled accurately using a quadratic probability distribution, rather than a normal distribution as is frequently assumed. The measurement used in the earlier Kollia–Jorgenson work involved the classical Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistical test. In the present work, the authors further explore the problem of analyzing the error terms coming from linear regression using a variety of known statistical tests, including, but not limited to chi‐square, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Anderson–Darling, Cramer–von Mises, skewness and kurtosis, and Durbin. Our study complements a similar study by Shapiro, Wilk, and Chen [J. Am. Stat. Assoc. (1968)]. [Partial support provided by PSC‐CUNY and NSF to Jay Jorgenson.]
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
May 2004
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
May 01 2004
Statistical comparison of similarity tests applied to speech production data
H. Kollia;
H. Kollia
Dept. of Commun. Disord., William Paterson Univ., Wayne, NJ 07470
Search for other works by this author on:
Jay Jorgenson;
Jay Jorgenson
The City College of the City Univ. of New York, New York, NY 10031
Search for other works by this author on:
Rose Saint Fleur;
Rose Saint Fleur
The City College of the City Univ. of New York, New York, NY 10031
Search for other works by this author on:
Kevin Foster
Kevin Foster
The City College of the City Univ. of New York, New York, NY 10031
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 2430–2431 (2004)
Citation
H. Kollia, Jay Jorgenson, Rose Saint Fleur, Kevin Foster; Statistical comparison of similarity tests applied to speech production data. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 May 2004; 115 (5_Supplement): 2430–2431. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4781510
Download citation file:
54
Views
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Maximum likelihood methodology applied to empirically described probability distributions of speech movement data
J Acoust Soc Am (February 1999)
On the error distributions of speech production data
J Acoust Soc Am (May 2001)
A SAS program to assess the sensitivity of normality tests on non-normal data
AIP Conference Proceedings (April 2013)
Power unit Burr-XII distribution: Statistical inference with applications
AIP Advances (October 2023)
Parameter estimation of spatial durbin model (SDM) using method of moment
AIP Conf. Proc. (April 2020)