Sampling for the measurement and description of methane gas bubbles in situ was accomplished using the method of Abegg and Anderson [Mar. Geol. 137, 137–147 (1997)]. Sediment cores from East Bay, off the mouth of the Mississippi River, were collected by divers and placed into aluminum pressure transfer chambers while on the seafloor. With the cores at seafloor pressure within the chambers, they were transferred to an x‐ray computed tomography (CT) scanner where high‐resolution images were made of the sediment within the cores. Data, in the format of series of cross‐sectional images of x‐ray attenuation reconstructed in 3‐D, were evaluated in terms of spatial distribution, sizes, and shapes of bubbles. CT imagery was obtained from a GE LS medical CT scanner at a local hospital and the Naval Research Laboratory’s new HD‐500 industrial CT scanner specifically designed for core sample imaging. The medical scanner provided images of stationary cores at 625‐μm intervals with a rotating x‐ray source and was able to resolve bubbles down to 625 μm in diameter. The industrial scanner provided images of rotating cores at 25‐μm intervals with a stationary source and was able to resolve bubbles down to 10 μm in diameter.
Skip Nav Destination
,
Article navigation
October 2003
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
October 08 2003
Determining gas bubble morphology and size distribution in mud using CT imagery Free
Kevin B. Briggs;
Kevin B. Briggs
Seafloor Sci. Branch, Naval Res. Lab., Stennis Space Center, MS 39529‐5004
Search for other works by this author on:
Allen H. Reed
Allen H. Reed
Seafloor Sci. Branch, Naval Res. Lab., Stennis Space Center, MS 39529‐5004
Search for other works by this author on:
Kevin B. Briggs
Allen H. Reed
Seafloor Sci. Branch, Naval Res. Lab., Stennis Space Center, MS 39529‐5004
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 2318 (2003)
Citation
Kevin B. Briggs, Allen H. Reed; Determining gas bubble morphology and size distribution in mud using CT imagery. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 2003; 114 (4_Supplement): 2318. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4780966
Download citation file:
62
Views
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Drawer-like tunable ventilated sound barrier
Yong Ge, Yi-jun Guan, et al.
Related Content
Gas bubbles in marine mud—How small are they?
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2003)
Predictions of the acoustic scattering response of free‐methane bubbles in muddy sediments
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (January 1996)
Broadband acoustic backscatter and high-resolution morphology of fish: Measurement and modeling
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2004)
A multi-orientation system for characterizing microstructure changes and mechanical responses of fine-grained gassy sediments associated with gas hydrates
Rev. Sci. Instrum. (July 2024)
Broadband acoustic backscatter and high‐resolution morphology of fish: Measurement and modeling
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2004)