Free gas in marine mud poses a challenging problem in the realm of ocean acoustics as it readily attenuates (i.e., scatters or absorbs) energy, such that objects lying below the gassy sediment are acoustically masked. Gas‐laden sediments were located in 10‐ to 120‐m water depth adjacent to the South Pass of the Mississippi River in East Bay using a 12‐kHz transducer and the Acoustic Sediment Classification System. Several cores were collected in this region for physical property measurements. Some of the cores were x‐rayed on medical and industrial computed tomography (CT) scanners. Volumetric CT images were used to locate gas bubbles, determine shapes and sizes to within the limits of the CT resolution. Free gas in the East Bay sediments was relegated to worm tubes as well as isolated pockets as was the case in Eckernförde Bay sediments [Abegg and Anderson, Mar. Geol. 137, 137–147 (1997)]. The primary significance of the present work is that gas bubbles have been determined to exist in the tens of μm size range, which is significantly smaller than the smallest bubbles that were previously resolved with medical CT (∼440 μm) with NRL’s HD‐500 micro‐CT System. [Work supported by ONR and NRL.]
Skip Nav Destination
,
Article navigation
October 2003
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
October 08 2003
Gas bubbles in marine mud—How small are they? Free
Allen H. Reed;
Allen H. Reed
Seafloor Sci. Branch, Naval Res. Lab., Stennis Space Center, MS 39529
Search for other works by this author on:
Kevin B. Briggs
Kevin B. Briggs
Seafloor Sci. Branch, Naval Res. Lab., Stennis Space Center, MS 39529
Search for other works by this author on:
Allen H. Reed
Kevin B. Briggs
Seafloor Sci. Branch, Naval Res. Lab., Stennis Space Center, MS 39529
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 2318 (2003)
Citation
Allen H. Reed, Kevin B. Briggs; Gas bubbles in marine mud—How small are they?. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 2003; 114 (4_Supplement): 2318. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4780967
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Variation in global and intonational pitch settings among black and white speakers of Southern American English
Aini Li, Ruaridh Purse, et al.
Related Content
Determining gas bubble morphology and size distribution in mud using CT imagery
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2003)
A multi-orientation system for characterizing microstructure changes and mechanical responses of fine-grained gassy sediments associated with gas hydrates
Rev. Sci. Instrum. (July 2024)
Acoustic propagation in gassy sediments
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 1998)
Predictions of the acoustic scattering response of free‐methane bubbles in muddy sediments
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (January 1996)
The nature and location of gassy sediment sections in the continental shelf and slope in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2003)