Cave paintings and ancient petroglyphs around the world are typically found in echo rich locations such as caves, canyons, and rocky cliff faces. Analysis of field data shows that echo decibel levels at a large number of prehistoric art sites are higher than those at nondecorated locations. The selection of these echoing environments by the artists appears not to be a mere coincidence. This paper considers the perception of an echoed sound as a psychoacoustic event that would have been inexplicable to ancient humans. A variety of ancient legends from cultures on several continents attribute the phenomenon of echoes to supernatural beings. These legends, together with the quantitative data, strongly implicate echoing as relevant to the artists of the past. The notion that the echoes were caused by spirits within the rock would explain not only the unusual locations of prehistoric art, but also the perplexing subject matter. For example, the common theme of hoofed animal imagery could have been inspired by echoes of percussion noises perceived as hoof beats. Further systematic acoustical studies of prehistoric art sites is warranted. Conservation of the natural acoustic properties of rock art environments—a previously unrecognized need—is urged.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 2002
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
October 25 2002
Psychoacoustic influences of the echoing environments of prehistoric art
Steven J. Waller
Steven J. Waller
Rock Art Acoust., 5381 Wellesley St., La Mesa, CA 91942
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 2284 (2002)
Citation
Steven J. Waller; Psychoacoustic influences of the echoing environments of prehistoric art. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 November 2002; 112 (5_Supplement): 2284. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4779166
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
Related Content
Virtual sound images and virtual sound absorbers misinterpreted as supernatural objects
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2014)
Auditory illusions of supernatural spirits: Archaeological evidence and experimental results
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2014)
Sound field studies in archaeological fieldwork: near or far, free or direct or diffuse field—How does it matter?
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2020)
Buffalo horns and the call of frogs: Some ancient free reed instruments from Southeast Asia.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2010)
Drone noise directivity and psychoacoustic evaluation using a hemispherical microphone array
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 2022)