During acoustic surveys for Mexican spotted owls, the effective detection range is presumed to be 0.25 mi (433 m). However, variations within and between surveys are observed, leading to a variance in owl density estimates. While owl behavior may explain some variation, topography and ambient noise are also likely to be important. To determine the influence of these factors, data from acoustic surveys for Mexican spotted owls in the Gila National Forest (April–July, 2000–2001) were examined. Measurements of owl and human call levels were made with a Sony TCD‐10 Pro II DAT equipped with an ACO 7013 microphone. Ambient noise was collected using 40 Larson‐Davis 820 and 824 sound level meters in owl activity centers. Wyle Laboratories NMSIM software was used to model propagation of owl and human calls. Owls produced calls with estimated maximum source levels of 92–98‐dB SPL. Human callers produced maximum source levels of 88–95‐dB SPL. Detection was possible out to more than 2 km under ideal conditions, but topography and ambient noise had a large effect. Corrections for these factors would greatly improve estimates of area surveyed, and thus owl density estimates. [Work supported by the U.S. Air Force, Air Combat Command.]
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
,
Article navigation
May 2002
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
May 01 2002
Acoustic surveys for Mexican spotted owls (Strix occidentalis lucida): An analysis Free
Ann E. Bowles;
Ann E. Bowles
Hubbs‐Sea World Res. Inst., 2595 Ingraham St., San Diego, CA 92109
Search for other works by this author on:
Chris Martindell;
Chris Martindell
Hubbs‐Sea World Res. Inst., 2595 Ingraham St., San Diego, CA 92109
Search for other works by this author on:
Kenneth J. Plotkin;
Kenneth J. Plotkin
Wyle Labs., Ste. 701, 2001 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202
Search for other works by this author on:
Bruce Ikelheimer;
Bruce Ikelheimer
Wyle Labs., Ste. 701, 2001 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202
Search for other works by this author on:
Tim Lavallee
Tim Lavallee
GeoMarine, Inc., 11846 Rock Landing Dr., Newport News, VA 23606
Search for other works by this author on:
Ann E. Bowles
Chris Martindell
Kenneth J. Plotkin
Bruce Ikelheimer
Tim Lavallee
Hubbs‐Sea World Res. Inst., 2595 Ingraham St., San Diego, CA 92109
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 2392 (2002)
Citation
Ann E. Bowles, Chris Martindell, Kenneth J. Plotkin, Bruce Ikelheimer, Tim Lavallee; Acoustic surveys for Mexican spotted owls (Strix occidentalis lucida): An analysis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 May 2002; 111 (5_Supplement): 2392. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4778127
Download citation file:
67
Views
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Variation in global and intonational pitch settings among black and white speakers of Southern American English
Aini Li, Ruaridh Purse, et al.
Related Content
Remote infrared acoustically triggered video monitoring unit
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 2000)
Effects of helicopter noise on spotted owls: Methodology
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 1995)
Response of nonbreeding spotted owls to helicopter and chain saw noise.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 1996)
Processing acoustic features of animal vocalizations using classification procedures.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2009)
Effective area of acoustic lure surveys for Mexican spotted owls (Strix occidentalis lucida)
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 2006)