When airborne sound couples into the ground, so‐called ‘‘slow’’ compressional waves can interact with a target buried in the soil and effect the vibration velocity of the surface. Donskoy [SPIE Proc. 3392, 211 (1998); 3710, 239 (1999)] has suggested a nonlinear technique that can detect an acoustically compliant buried mine that is insensitive to relatively noncompliant targets. A VS 1.6 inert antitank mine (23 cm diam) was buried in the natural loess soil at the test site. In the linear experiment, a pair of subwoofers were sinusoidally swept from 70 to 600 Hz. The geophone’s response was measured along a 1 m scan segment across the mine. A 107 Hz resonance was chosen and the nonlinear experiment was performed by driving the woofers at f1=300 Hz and f2=407 Hz and detecting at the difference frequency. Nonlinear scan profiles over the mine have more relative sensitivity than the linear profiles. When a 30 cm diam, 4 cm thick concrete disk was buried, it could be detected ‘‘linearly’’ but not ‘‘nonlinearly’’ in agreement with Donskoy. Nonlinear theories will be discussed. [Work supported by the United States Army Communications‐Electronics Command Night Vision and Electronic Sensors Directorate.]
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 2001
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
November 01 2001
Comparison of linear and nonlinear experiments for landmine detection
George Nock;
George Nock
Natl. Ctr. for Physical Acoust., Coliseum Dr., University, MS 38677
Search for other works by this author on:
Manaf Ali;
Manaf Ali
Natl. Ctr. for Physical Acoust., Coliseum Dr., University, MS 38677
Search for other works by this author on:
James M. Sabatier;
James M. Sabatier
Natl. Ctr. for Physical Acoust., Coliseum Dr., University, MS 38677
Search for other works by this author on:
Murray S. Korman
Murray S. Korman
Dept. of Phys., U.S. Naval Acad., Annapolis, MD 21402
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 2758 (2001)
Citation
George Nock, Manaf Ali, James M. Sabatier, Murray S. Korman; Comparison of linear and nonlinear experiments for landmine detection. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 November 2001; 110 (5_Supplement): 2758. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4777621
Download citation file:
32
Views
Citing articles via
Vowel signatures in emotional interjections and nonlinguistic vocalizations expressing pain, disgust, and joy across languages
Maïa Ponsonnet, Christophe Coupé, et al.
The alveolar trill is perceived as jagged/rough by speakers of different languages
Aleksandra Ćwiek, Rémi Anselme, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Studying the mechanical behavior of a plastic, shock-resisting, antitank landmine
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (December 2006)
Nonlinear acoustic techniques for landmine detection
J Acoust Soc Am (December 2004)
An experimental study on antipersonnel landmine detection using acoustic-to-seismic coupling
J Acoust Soc Am (February 2003)
Nonlinear acoustic techniques for landmine detection: Experiments and theory
J Acoust Soc Am (November 2001)
Nonlinear Acoustic Experiments Involving Landmine Detection: Connections with Mesoscopic Elasticity and Slow Dynamics in Geomaterials
AIP Conference Proceedings (May 2006)