A nonlinear acoustic technique for detecting buried landmines has been suggested by Donskoy [SPIE Proc. 3392, 211 (1998); 3710, 239 (1999)]. Airborne sound at two primary frequencies f1 and f2 undergo acoustic‐to‐seismic coupling and a superimposed ‘‘slow’’ compressional wave interacts with the compliant mine and soil. The nonlinear mechanism involves a simple model of the top surface of the mine–soil planar surface separating two elastic surfaces. During the compression phase of the wave, the surfaces stay together and then separate under the tensile phase due to a relatively high compliance of the mine. This ‘‘bouncing‘‘ soil–mine interface is thought to be a bimodular oscillator that is inherently nonlinear. Geophone measurements scanning the soil’s surface (at the difference frequency) profile the mine, but off the mine some nonlinearity exits. Amplitude‐dependent frequency response curves for a harmonically driven mass‐soil oscillator are used to find the nonlinearity of the soil acting as a ‘‘soft’’ spring. Finally, a layer of soil in a large tube, terminated by a thin elastic plate, is used to model the bimodular nonlinearity. [Work supported by the United States Army Communications‐Electronics Command Night Vision and Electronic Sensors Directorate.]
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 2001
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
November 01 2001
Nonlinear acoustic techniques for landmine detection: Experiments and theory
Murray S. Korman;
Murray S. Korman
Dept. of Phys., U.S. Naval Acad., Annapolis, MD 21402
Search for other works by this author on:
James M. Sabatier
James M. Sabatier
Natl. Ctr. for Physical Acoust., Univ. of Mississippi, University, MS 38677
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 2757 (2001)
Citation
Murray S. Korman, James M. Sabatier; Nonlinear acoustic techniques for landmine detection: Experiments and theory. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 November 2001; 110 (5_Supplement): 2757. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4777617
Download citation file:
64
Views
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Nonlinear acoustic techniques for landmine detection: Tuning curves and two‐tone tests
J Acoust Soc Am (October 2003)
Nonlinear acoustic techniques for landmine detection
J Acoust Soc Am (December 2004)
Comparison of linear and nonlinear experiments for landmine detection
J Acoust Soc Am (November 2001)
Nonlinear acoustic techniques for landmine detection: Experiments and theory, Part II
J Acoust Soc Am (May 2002)
Measurement and modeling of pulsed bi-frequency, nonlinear acoustic excitation of buried landmines
J Acoust Soc Am (November 2013)