An extended version of the Test of Basic Auditory Capabilities (TBAC) [Watson et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Suppl. 1 71, S73 (1982)] includes 19 subtests that evaluate listeners’ abilities to discriminate and identify auditory stimuli. Stimuli include single tones, tonal sequences, SAM and rippled noise, temporal gaps, nonwords, words, sentences, and environmental sounds. A total of 340 college‐student subjects were tested with this battery of tests. A principal components analysis yielded a four‐factor solution that accounts for roughly 50% of the variance. The first factor primarily reflects loudness and duration discrimination, the second is associated with sensitivity to temporal envelope variation (SAM noises), the third is associated with identification of highly familiar sounds, whether they be speech or nonspeech, and the fourth factor includes pitch‐discrimination and spectral‐temporal tasks, suggesting a common ability to discriminate complex patterns. As in earlier studies in this series, measures of spectral and temporal resolving power for laboratory‐generated sounds are very weak predictors of individual differences in speech processing. SAT scores and grades in college courses were also examined to assess the relation between auditory perceptual abilities and abilities in language and mathematics. [Work supported by NIH/NIDCD.]
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
Article navigation
November 2000
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
November 01 2000
Individual differences in auditory abilities among normal‐hearing listeners
Gary R. Kidd;
Gary R. Kidd
Dept. of Speech and Hearing Sci., Indiana Univ., Bloomington, IN 47405,
Search for other works by this author on:
Charles S. Watson;
Charles S. Watson
Dept. of Speech and Hearing Sci., Indiana Univ., Bloomington, IN 47405,
Search for other works by this author on:
Brian Gygi
Brian Gygi
Dept. of Speech and Hearing Sci., Indiana Univ., Bloomington, IN 47405,
Search for other works by this author on:
Gary R. Kidd
Charles S. Watson
Brian Gygi
Dept. of Speech and Hearing Sci., Indiana Univ., Bloomington, IN 47405,
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 2641–2642 (2000)
Citation
Gary R. Kidd, Charles S. Watson, Brian Gygi; Individual differences in auditory abilities among normal‐hearing listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 November 2000; 108 (5_Supplement): 2641–2642. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4743842
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
Related Content
Low commonality between tests of auditory discrimination and of speech perception
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)
Individual differences in the processing of speech and nonspeech sounds by normal-hearing listeners
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2001)
Individual differences in auditory abilities
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (July 2007)
Studying environmental sounds the Watson way
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2004)
Basic auditory capabilities and resolving power for phonemes
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)