An October 1999 survey of several leading speech recognition software manufacturers revealed that the speech technology industry is unprepared to serve users with vocal pathologies in 2000. Companies surveyed had neither prepared for consumers with vocal pathologies nor had immediate plans to alter systems to accommodate the pathological voice by 2002. Examples of vocal pathologies include leukoplakia, carcinoma, hyperfunction, polyps, and nodules. While the aforementioned pathologies involve direct impairment to the vocal mechanism (e.g., swollen pharyngeal mucous membranes, vocal fold polyps), neurological disorders such as Parkinsons disease also cause vocal pathologies (e.g., dysarthrias, spasmodic dysphonia). Some companies are beginning to incorporate natural language processing for consumers with aphasia; however, many of the top producers of speech recognition engines have not considered the pathological voice within their disability market. Acknowledging that the speech technology market is still new, speech recognition software developers note that lack of time and manpower prohibits concentration on groups with special needs. This research examines the feasibility of altering linguistic grammars of templates from healthy, prototypical voices to accommodate the phonetic changes that are observed in the pathological voice. Backus‐Naur form and Chomskys syntactic structures are used to modify existing grammar templates.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
May 2000
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
May 01 2000
Pathologies not included: Survey of premillennium speech recognition software
Renetta Tull
Renetta Tull
Dept. of Communicative Disord., Trace R & D Ctr., Univ. of Wisconsin—Madison, 1500 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53705, [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 2907 (2000)
Citation
Renetta Tull; Pathologies not included: Survey of premillennium speech recognition software. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 May 2000; 107 (5_Supplement): 2907. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428821
Download citation file:
61
Views
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Asymmetric spatiotemporal chaos induced by a polypoid mass in the excised larynx
Chaos (October 2008)
Analysis of pathological voices with a sound spectrograph
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Adductor spasmodic dysphonia: Relationships between acoustic indices and perceptual judgments
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2003)
Characterization of the airflow through a scaled physical vocal fold model with a unilateral polyp.
J Acoust Soc Am (October 2009)
Using the stability of vocal onsets to evaluate vocal effort in response to changing acoustical conditions
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2015)