The usual method of measuring noise with a sound‐level meter at the position of the exposed person, but with the person absent, is not applicable for sound sources placed close to the ears. For measurement of the noise emission from such sources, the coupling between the sound source and the ear must be similar to that of the real life situation. This can be achieved by using the microphone in real ear technique (the MIRE technique) or the manikin technique as described in the upcoming ISO 11904, parts 1 and 2, respectively. For evaluation and comparison with traditional criteria, the measured ear or manikin sound‐pressure levels are subsequently converted into either free‐field or diffuse‐field equivalent sound‐pressure levels. The uncertainty of the final result depends on the method used. For the MIRE technique, the uncertainty is mainly related to the statistical uncertainty as determined by the variation between humans and the number of subjects used. For the manikin technique, the uncertainty is mainly related to the deviation of the manikin’s acoustical characteristics from those of humans. The paper presents an overview of the methods and examples of practical results.
Skip Nav Destination
,
Article navigation
February 1999
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
February 01 1999
Assessment of methods for determining field‐equivalent sound levels from real‐ear and manikin measurements Free
Dorte Hammershoei;
Dorte Hammershoei
Acoust. Lab., Aalborg Univ., Fredrik Bajers Vej 7 B4, DK‐9220 Aalborg O, Denmark
Search for other works by this author on:
Henrik Moller
Henrik Moller
Acoust. Lab., Aalborg Univ., Fredrik Bajers Vej 7 B4, DK‐9220 Aalborg O, Denmark
Search for other works by this author on:
Dorte Hammershoei
Henrik Moller
Acoust. Lab., Aalborg Univ., Fredrik Bajers Vej 7 B4, DK‐9220 Aalborg O, Denmark
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 1010 (1999)
Citation
Dorte Hammershoei, Henrik Moller; Assessment of methods for determining field‐equivalent sound levels from real‐ear and manikin measurements. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 February 1999; 105 (2_Supplement): 1010. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.425835
Download citation file:
44
Views
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Drawer-like tunable ventilated sound barrier
Yong Ge, Yi-jun Guan, et al.
Related Content
High fidelity hearing protection devices: Attenuation in human ears and manikin devices
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2020)
Comparison of direct measurement methods for headset noise exposure in the workplace
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust. (May 2013)
Comparison of direct measurement methods for headset noise exposure in the workplace
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2013)
Manikin Measurements of the Noise Attenuation Provided by Flight Helmets
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (July 1969)
Measuring sound attenuation capabilities of helmets using a KEMAR manikin
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)