Phonological speech errors are a traditional source of evidence for phonological units, such as features and segments, in both linguistic and psycholinguistic theory. Assumptions about the unitary nature of speech errors have been brought into question by research that found evidence for subfeatural errors in speech production [R. Mowrey and I. MacKay, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 1299–1312 (1990)]. This poster presents data from an ongoing acoustic study of speech errors in /s/ and /z/ productions. Previously reported findings indicate that the errors involve either single or multiple changes in periodicity, amplitude and duration of frication, and vowel rise time [S. Frisch and R. Wright, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 3178(A) (1997)]. The data are tape recordings of an error‐inducing experiment using nonsense tongue twisters. Recordings of six talkers producing four different tongue twisters targeting /s/ and /z/, for examples, ‘‘sit zap zoo sip,’’ were digitized and analyzed. This study examines the phonetic variation in featural and subfeatural errors across talkers and segmental contexts. Results suggest that details of individual talker’s production strategies and the phonetic context influence the distribution of featural and subfeatural errors. [Work supported by NIH Grant No. DC00012.]
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 1997
Meeting abstract. No PDF available.
November 01 1997
Phonetic variability in /s/ and /z/ segment errors: A multitalker acoustic study Free
Richard Wright;
Richard Wright
Speech Res. Lab., Dept. of Psych., Indiana Univ., Bloomington, IN 47405
Search for other works by this author on:
Stefan Frisch
Stefan Frisch
Speech Res. Lab., Dept. of Psych., Indiana Univ., Bloomington, IN 47405
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard Wright
Speech Res. Lab., Dept. of Psych., Indiana Univ., Bloomington, IN 47405
Stefan Frisch
Speech Res. Lab., Dept. of Psych., Indiana Univ., Bloomington, IN 47405
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 3092 (1997)
Citation
Richard Wright, Stefan Frisch; Phonetic variability in /s/ and /z/ segment errors: A multitalker acoustic study. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 November 1997; 102 (5_Supplement): 3092. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.420461
Download citation file:
65
Views
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Variation in global and intonational pitch settings among black and white speakers of Southern American English
Aini Li, Ruaridh Purse, et al.
Related Content
Acoustic evidence for featural and subfeatural errors in speech production
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 1997)
A comparison of speech errors elicited by sentences and alternating repetitive tongue twisters
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 2013)
Phonemic errors are not always categorical: Articulatory evidence
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2002)
Temporal measures of tongue twisters produced by children
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 1997)
Two perspectives on similarity between words
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2003)