Speaking is universally acknowledged as an important human talent, yet as a topic of educated common knowledge, it is peculiarly neglected. Partly, this is a consequence of the relatively recent growth of research on speech perception, production, and development, but also a function of the way that information is sliced up by undergraduate colleges. Although the basic acoustic mechanism of vowel production was known to Helmholtz, the ability to view speech production as a physiological event is evolving even now with such techniques as fMRI. Intensive research on speech perception emerged only in the early 1930s as Fletcher and the engineers at Bell Telephone Laboratories developed the transmission of speech over telephone lines. The study of speech development was revolutionized by the papers of Eimas and his colleagues on speech perception in infants in the 1970s. Dissemination of knowledge in these fields is the responsibility of no single academic discipline. It forms a center for two departments, Linguistics, and Speech and Hearing, but in the former, there is a heavy emphasis on other aspects of language than speech and, in the latter, a focus on clinical practice. For psychologists, it is a rather minor component of a very diverse assembly of topics. I will focus on these three fields in proposing possible remedies.
September 01 2005
Speech neglect: A strange educational blind spot
Katherine Safford Harris
Katherine Safford Harris
Haskins Labs., 300 George St., New Haven, CT 06511 and Grad. School, City Univ. of New York, New York, NY
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 1912 (2005)
Citation
Katherine Safford Harris; Speech neglect: A strange educational blind spot. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 September 2005; 118 (3_Supplement): 1912. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4780250
Download citation file: