Large amounts of simultaneous masking can be produced by changing the frequency content of multicomponent maskers with each presentation. Much of this masking appears to be informational, that is, produced by stimulus uncertainty. This study examined whether relatively simple changes in the properties or presentation mode of the signal could increase the saliency of the signal and reduce this masking. The number of masker components varied from 2 to 100 across conditions. The reference signal was a 200‐ms, 1000‐Hz sinusoid, presented monaurally with the masker. Across experiments, changes in masking relative to the reference condition were examined for different signal types (amplitude‐modulated, quasifrequency‐modulated, or narrow‐band noise), durations (100 or 10 ms), and presentation modes (diotic, dichotic, or cross ear). The use of AM and NBN signals improved performance more consistently than the QFM signal, which degraded performance for some listeners. Lower masking in the reference condition for these listeners may have limited the effects of signal type. Dichotic (versus monaural) presentation produced larger reductions in masking for more listeners and conditions. Comparisons to results with broadband maskers and other patterns in the data, however, suggest the dichotic advantage may not clearly reflect a reduction of masking due to uncertainty. Separating masker and signal onset/offset times by shortening signal duration produced the largest and most consistent reductions in masking produced by masker‐frequency uncertainty.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 1995
October 01 1995
Signal properties that reduce masking by simultaneous, random‐frequency maskers
Donna L. Neff
Donna L. Neff
Boys Town National Research Hospital, 555 North 30th Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68131
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 1909–1920 (1995)
Article history
Received:
May 02 1994
Accepted:
May 05 1995
Citation
Donna L. Neff; Signal properties that reduce masking by simultaneous, random‐frequency maskers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 1995; 98 (4): 1909–1920. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.414458
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Performance study of ray-based ocean acoustic tomography methods for estimating submesoscale variability in the upper ocean
Etienne Ollivier, Richard X. Touret, et al.
Related Content
Detection cues in forward masking and their relationship to off‐frequency listening
J Acoust Soc Am (August 1986)
The effect of olivocochlear bundle transection on tuning curves and acoustic distortion products
J Acoust Soc Am (October 1992)