Thresholds for formant frequency discrimination were shown to be in the range of 1%–2% by Kewley‐Port and Watson [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 485–496 (1994)]. The present experiment extends that study and one by Mermelstein [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 572–580 (1978)] to determine the effect of consonantal context on the discrimination of formant frequency. Thresholds for formant frequency were measured under minimal stimulus uncertainty for the vowel /i/ synthesized in isolation and in CVC syllables with the consonants /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /m/, and /l/. Overall, the effects of consonantal context were similar to those reported by Mermelstein (1978), although his threshold estimates were a factor of 4–5 times larger because less‐than‐optimal psychophysical methods had been used. Compared to the vowel in isolation, consonantal context had little effect on thresholds for F1 and a larger effect on F2. When a shift in threshold was observed, subject variability was high and resolution was degraded by as much as a factor of 2. Analyses of stimulus parameters indicated that resolution was degraded by shortening steady‐state vowel duration or if the separation between the onsets of the formant transitions was small. Overall, consonantal context makes it more difficult for some, but not all, listeners to resolve formant frequency as accurately as for vowels in isolation.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
May 1995
May 01 1995
Thresholds for formant‐frequency discrimination of vowels in consonantal context
Diane Kewley‐Port
Diane Kewley‐Port
Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Speech and Hearing Center, Bloomington, Indiana 47405
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 3139–3146 (1995)
Article history
Received:
July 29 1994
Accepted:
January 24 1995
Citation
Diane Kewley‐Port; Thresholds for formant‐frequency discrimination of vowels in consonantal context. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 May 1995; 97 (5): 3139–3146. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.413106
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Rapid detection of fish calls within diverse coral reef soundscapes using a convolutional neural network
Seth McCammon, Nathan Formel, et al.
Related Content
Vowel and consonant judgments are not independent when cued by the same information
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Cue enhancement and effects in [l] and [n] identification in L2 English
J Acoust Soc Am (September 2018)
Principal components analysis of x‐ray microbeam pellet positions
J Acoust Soc Am (October 1999)
Difference limens for formant frequencies of steady‐state and consonant‐bounded vowels
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Difference limens for formant frequencies of steady‐state and consonant‐bound vowels
J Acoust Soc Am (February 1978)