Controversy exists over the extent to which psychoacoustic abilities explain speech perception. The present study addressed this issue by assessing the contribution of psychoacoustic abilities to speech identification by hearing‐impaired listeners. Speech stimuli and nonspeech analogs were presented to normal‐hearing and hearing‐impaired listeners with varying degrees of hearing loss. Phonemic judgments for synthetic versions of ‘‘say–stay’’ stimuli were evaluated as a function of first formant onset frequency and of silence duration between the /s/ noise and the vocalic portion. Three psychoacoustic measures were obtained: glide onset frequency discrimination, gap detection in noise, and gap detection in speechlike composite signals. Although the resulting difference limens increased with increasing hearing loss, the acoustic cues to the speech contrast were available to all listeners. Nonetheless, the response patterns to the speech stimuli varied among groups in a manner that was not explained by the psychoacoustic results. Thus, although hearing‐impaired listeners were able to detect and discriminate essential acoustic cues for speech, the perceptual organization of speech stimuli appeared to differ with degree of loss. Alternative explanations for the findings are considered, including the possible effect of hearing loss on auditory/linguistic experience.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
Article navigation
March 1995
March 01 1995
‘‘Say–stay’’ identification and psychoacoustic performance of hearing‐impaired listeners Available to Purchase
Peggy B. Nelson;
Peggy B. Nelson
University of Kansas Medical Center, Hearing and Speech Department, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, Kansas 66160‐7605
Search for other works by this author on:
Susan Nittrouer;
Susan Nittrouer
University of Nebraska—Omaha, Department of Special Education and Communicative Disorders, Omaha, Nebraska 68131
Search for other works by this author on:
Susan J. Norton
Susan J. Norton
University of Kansas Medical Center, Hearing and Speech Department, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, Kansas 66160‐7605
Search for other works by this author on:
Peggy B. Nelson
Susan Nittrouer
Susan J. Norton
University of Kansas Medical Center, Hearing and Speech Department, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, Kansas 66160‐7605
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 1830–1838 (1995)
Article history
Received:
January 19 1993
Accepted:
October 09 1994
Citation
Peggy B. Nelson, Susan Nittrouer, Susan J. Norton; ‘‘Say–stay’’ identification and psychoacoustic performance of hearing‐impaired listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 March 1995; 97 (3): 1830–1838. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.412057
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Variation in global and intonational pitch settings among black and white speakers of Southern American English
Aini Li, Ruaridh Purse, et al.
Related Content
Relationship between psychoacoustics and ‘‘say–stay’’ identification in hearing‐impaired listeners.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 1991)
Phonetic identification in quiet and in noise by listeners with cochlear implants
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2005)
Re‐examining age‐related differences in the perception of ‘‘say/stay.’’
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 1996)
Training humans in non-native phoneme perception using a monkey psychoacoustic procedure
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (June 2007)
Perceptual equivalence of cues for a phonetic trading relation: Primacy of phonetic over psychoacoustic effects
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)