Acoustic impulse techniques are used to obtain measurements of propagation constant in three different foams and to determine both the characteristic impedance and the normal impedance at the surface of a hard‐backed layer over the frequency range from 200 Hz to 10 kHz. A comparison is made of existing rigid‐frame and dual‐wave models of sound propagation in porous media, and predictions from both models are compared with experimental measurements. Both models give good agreement with the lower flow resistivity foam measurements, however, the dual‐wave model better predicts the overall results for a foam with a flow resistivity of 25100 N s m−4, implying the need of the slow wave mode. The position of the maxima in the layer impedance results are particularly sensitive to the correct choice of tortuosity. An emphasis is placed on how the two models compare as the frame material becomes rigid and these ideas are used to consider the implication of a previous claim about the existence of a slow wave in foams.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 1995
March 01 1995
Impulse measurements of impedance and propagation constant compared to rigid‐frame and dual‐wave predictions for foam
D. E. P. Lawrence;
D. E. P. Lawrence
Department of Physics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
C. G. Don
C. G. Don
Department of Physics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 1477–1485 (1995)
Article history
Received:
February 02 1994
Accepted:
October 31 1994
Citation
D. E. P. Lawrence, C. G. Don; Impulse measurements of impedance and propagation constant compared to rigid‐frame and dual‐wave predictions for foam. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 March 1995; 97 (3): 1477–1485. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.412087
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Standing wave apparatus for measuring fundamental properties of acoustic materials in air
J Acoust Soc Am (October 1990)
Acoustical characteristics of rigid fibrous absorbents and granular materials
J Acoust Soc Am (March 1983)
Acoustics of thunder: A quasilinear model for tortuous lightning
J Acoust Soc Am (December 1982)