Low‐frequency (57‐Hz) signals from the Heard Island Feasibility Test, conducted in January 1991 were received on many hydrophones around the globe. The Atlantic and Indian Ocean paths were relatively clear and unimpeded, so received signal‐to‐noise ratios (after some averaging) were generally high. The Pacific paths were not as clear and considerable interaction with bathymetric features attenuated the signals received off the west coast of the U.S. A New Zealand‐manned receiver in the Tasman Sea received the transmissions strongly, but a Japanese ship, placed strategically northeast of the south Fiji (Lau) Ridge did not detect any signals. There is good evidence from U.S. west coast receivers with beam forming capability, that the signals arrived from 20 deg further south (i.e., south of New Zealand, then through the Polynesian window) than if they had passed through the Tasman Sea window. Doppler‐derived matching of transmitted and received azimuths further indicates that all U.S. west coast signals traveled south of New Zealand. A series of transverse ridges lying between northern New Zealand and New Caledonia and Fiji appears to have effectively blocked the transmissions from exiting the Tasman Sea. An adiabatic modal model of refracted geodesic raypaths sheds some light on the reasons for such effective blockage.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 1994
October 01 1994
The Tasman blockage—An acoustic sink for the Heard Island feasibility test?
A. M. G. Forbes
A. M. G. Forbes
CSIRO Division of Oceanography, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96, 2428–2431 (1994)
Article history
Received:
August 20 1992
Accepted:
June 07 1994
Citation
A. M. G. Forbes; The Tasman blockage—An acoustic sink for the Heard Island feasibility test?. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 1994; 96 (4): 2428–2431. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.410115
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Does sound symbolism need sound?: The role of articulatory movement in detecting iconicity between sound and meaning
Mutsumi Imai, Sotaro Kita, et al.
Related Content
Ambient sea noise in waters near Australia
J Acoust Soc Am (August 1976)
The Heard Island Feasibility Test
J Acoust Soc Am (October 1994)
Resolution of low‐frequency attenuation anomalies in the Southern Hemisphere
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Toward an unsupervised and automated analysis framework for large acoustic datasets to assess animal biodiversity and ecosystem health
J Acoust Soc Am (May 2017)
Measurements of low‐frequency wind‐generated ambient noise in the deep ocean
J Acoust Soc Am (May 1981)