This paper examines how discrimination of envelope frequency in one spectral region is affected by the presence of either correlated or uncorrelated modulation in another spectral region. Envelope‐frequency discrimination thresholds, Δfe’s, for a 60‐dB SPL two‐tone complex centered at 2 kHz were measured in the presence or absence of an auxiliary two‐tone complex at another frequency. When present, the auxiliary complex had either the same envelope as the standard signal or an envelope that was uncorrelated with both the standard and variable signal. The results show that listeners can take advantage of correlation between simultaneous envelopes in different frequency regions to improve discrimination of a small change in envelope frequency, whereas the presence of uncorrelated envelopes causes interference with discrimination. Except when the auxiliary complex and the signal are close together in frequency, the discrimination advantage afforded by the correlated auxiliaries appears to reflect across‐channel envelope processing. The discrimination interference caused by the uncorrelated auxiliaries, on the other hand, may reflect primarily within‐channel interaction such as peripheral masking, although a small amount of across‐channel masking also is apparent.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 1994
September 01 1994
Discrimination of envelope frequency in one spectral region in the presence of modulation in another
So/ren Buus;
So/ren Buus
Communication and Digital Signal Processing Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (409 DA), Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Search for other works by this author on:
Chi Pan
Chi Pan
Communication and Digital Signal Processing Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (409 DA), Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96, 1445–1457 (1994)
Article history
Received:
February 01 1994
Accepted:
May 23 1994
Citation
So/ren Buus, Chi Pan; Discrimination of envelope frequency in one spectral region in the presence of modulation in another. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 September 1994; 96 (3): 1445–1457. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.411442
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Instrument to Measure Water‐Wave Height
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 1963)
Discrimination of envelope frequency
J Acoust Soc Am (December 1983)
Residue Pitch: A Remaining Paradox and a Possible Explanation
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (July 1966)
Pitch Discrimination of Two‐Frequency Complexes
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 1960)
Functional brain imaging and hearing
J Acoust Soc Am (September 1994)