The distinction between stressed and unstressed vowels in noun/verb pairs differentiated by stress (e.g., as in the word ‘‘misprint’’) is known to be cued by the acoustic attributes fundamental frequency, intensity, and duration. The role of these cues and vowel centralization measures in perception is ordered differently from that in production. It is not known what variability there is between speakers, whether the acoustic factors vary with speech clarity that a speaker produces on different occasions, or what the relationship is between the various speech attributes. Importantly, no studies have been performed in which production and perception of materials is compared with respect to these questions. In the current study, noun/verb pairs differentiated by stress were produced by four speakers, and measures of produced and perceived clarity obtained for these subjects. The importance of the acoustic factors to the contrast was modeled in perception and production, and the results compared. Additionally, the variation with produced or perceived clarity was ascertained. Finally, comparison between cue trading in production and perception was made. The results are discussed in connection with models of speech perception and production.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 1993
October 01 1993
Cue trading in the production and perception of vowel stress
Peter Howell
Peter Howell
Department of Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, England
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94, 2063–2073 (1993)
Article history
Received:
June 15 1992
Accepted:
May 31 1993
Citation
Peter Howell; Cue trading in the production and perception of vowel stress. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 1993; 94 (4): 2063–2073. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.407479
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Fundamental frequency stability characteristics of elderly women’s voices
J Acoust Soc Am (April 1987)
Intraspeaker variability in fundamental frequency stability: An age‐related phenomenon?
J Acoust Soc Am (February 1988)
Masking‐level differences for trains of clicks
J Acoust Soc Am (July 1986)
Unconventional reciprocity calibration of transducers
J Acoust Soc Am (June 1978)
Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question–answer contexts
J Acoust Soc Am (June 1985)