This study evaluated stethoscope acoustics by using a sound frequency generator and an active artificial ear. Six popular, currently available stethoscopes were compared in their various modes involving bells, diaphragms, etc.: Littmann Classic II, Littmann Cardiology II, Littmann Master Cardiology, Hewlett‐Packard Rappaport‐Sprague, Tycos Harvey Triple Head, and Allen Medical Series 5A RPS Binaural. The transfer function was measured from 37.5–1000 Hz, the range where nearly all heart and lung sounds are found. Sound in the low‐frequency range (37.5–112.5 Hz) was in most cases amplified by the bells and attenuated by the diaphragms; however, there were no significant differences. Both bells and diaphragms attenuated sound transmission in the high range, and this increased with frequency. The Tycos Harvey Triple Head ribbed diaphragm attenuated sound transmission to a significantly greater extent than the other diaphragms (P<0.01). The results show that the bell and diaphragm for a given stethoscope usually have different transmission characteristics, particularly at low frequencies. The Littmann Classic II is an exception. The Hewlett–Packard and Tycos Harvey stethoscopes showed the greatest differences in low frequency response between the bell and the diaphragm. While the differences found in sound transmission between stethoscopes were in most cases small, the Littmann Cardiology II, bell and diaphragm, appears to possess the best overall performance by this study design.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
April 1992
April 01 1992
Comparison of the acoustic properties of six popular stethoscopes
Manuel Abella;
Manuel Abella
Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology Division, St. John Hospital, Detroit, Michigan 48201
Search for other works by this author on:
John Formolo;
John Formolo
Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology Division, St. John Hospital, Detroit, Michigan 48201
Search for other works by this author on:
David G. Penney
David G. Penney
Department of Internal Medicine, Health Education Division, St. John Hospital, Detroit, Michigan 48201
Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48236
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 2224–2228 (1992)
Article history
Received:
October 22 1991
Accepted:
December 26 1991
Citation
Manuel Abella, John Formolo, David G. Penney; Comparison of the acoustic properties of six popular stethoscopes. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 April 1992; 91 (4): 2224–2228. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.403655
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Co-speech head nods are used to enhance prosodic prominence at different levels of narrow focus in French
Christopher Carignan, Núria Esteve-Gibert, et al.
Source and propagation modelling scenarios for environmental impact assessment: Model verification
Michael A. Ainslie, Robert M. Laws, et al.
Related Content
Fabrication of low-cost 3D printed stethoscope: Material selections and acoustical performance
AIP Conf. Proc. (May 2023)
Perceptual audio processing stethoscope
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (September 2019)
Design of a high SNR electronic heart sound sensor based on a MEMS bionic hydrophone
AIP Advances (January 2019)
A basic investigation into the optimization of cylindrical tubes used as acoustic stethoscopes for auscultation in COVID-19 diagnosis
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (January 2021)
An adaptive noise reduction stethoscope for auscultation in high noise environments
J Acoust Soc Am (May 1998)