Frequency selectivity and consonant recognition were determined for normal‐hearing and hearing‐impaired listeners using techniques that facilitate comparisons of performance among listeners whose absolute thresholds vary in magnitude and configuration. First, for each of six subjects with cochlear hearing loss, masked thresholds in notched noise and narrow‐band‐noise maskers were obtained and compared to results for three normal‐hearing listeners whose thresholds were precisely matched to the impaired listeners’ by masking with spectrally shaped broadband noise. Second, for hearing‐impaired listeners and their masked normal‐hearing controls, measurements of consonant recognition were obtained at several speech‐presentation levels selected on the basis of articulation‐index predictions to assure equal speech‐spectrum audibility across listeners. The results suggest that frequency selectivity is poorer for hearing‐impaired listeners than for masked normal‐hearing listeners, even when thresholds among subjects are equated, but the deviation from normal frequency selectivity is smaller than estimated from comparisons with normal‐hearing listeners in quiet. Critical ratios for hearing‐impaired listeners are equivalent to normal. Although frequency selectivity is reduced, there is no consistent difference in consonant recognition between hearing‐impaired subjects and masked normal‐hearing subjects, when performance is assessed under conditions that assure equal speech‐spectrum audibility across subjects.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
April 1992
April 01 1992
Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing‐impaired and masked normal‐hearing listeners
Judy R. Dubno;
Judy R. Dubno
Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Otolaryngology and Communicative Sciences, Charleston, South Carolina 29425
Search for other works by this author on:
Amy B. Schaefer
Amy B. Schaefer
UCLA School of Medicine, Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Los Angeles, California 90024
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 2110–2121 (1992)
Article history
Received:
February 15 1991
Accepted:
January 08 1992
Citation
Judy R. Dubno, Amy B. Schaefer; Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing‐impaired and masked normal‐hearing listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 April 1992; 91 (4): 2110–2121. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.403697
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Vowel signatures in emotional interjections and nonlinguistic vocalizations expressing pain, disgust, and joy across languages
Maïa Ponsonnet, Christophe Coupé, et al.
The alveolar trill is perceived as jagged/rough by speakers of different languages
Aleksandra Ćwiek, Rémi Anselme, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Application of the articulation index to the speech recognition of normal and impaired listeners wearing hearing protection
J Acoust Soc Am (March 1990)
Masked thresholds and consonant recognition in low‐pass maskers for hearing‐impaired and normal‐hearing listeners
J Acoust Soc Am (April 1995)
Minimal upward spread of masking: Correlations with speech and auditory brainstem response masked thresholds
J Acoust Soc Am (June 1993)
Robust estimation of speech in noisy backgrounds based on aspects of the auditory process
J Acoust Soc Am (June 1995)