The purpose of this study is to specify the contribution of certain frequency regions to consonant place perception for normal‐hearing listeners and listeners with high‐frequency hearing loss, and to characterize the differences in stop‐consonant place perception among these listeners. Stop‐consonant recognition and error patterns were examined at various speech‐presentation levels and under conditions of low‐ and high‐pass filtering. Subjects included 18 normal‐hearing listeners and a homogeneous group of 10 young, hearing‐impaired individuals with high‐frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Differential filtering effects on consonant place perception were consistent with the spectral composition of acoustic cues. Differences in consonant recognition and error patterns between normal‐hearing and hearing‐impaired listeners were observed when the stimulus bandwidth included regions of threshold elevation for the hearing‐impaired listeners. Thus place‐perception differences among listeners are, for the most part, associated with stimulus bandwidths corresponding to regions of hearing loss.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 1989
January 01 1989
Stop‐consonant recognition for normal‐hearing listeners and listeners with high‐frequency hearing loss. I: The contribution of selected frequency regions
Judy R. Dubno;
Judy R. Dubno
UCLA School of Medicine, Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Los Angeles, California 90024
Search for other works by this author on:
Donald D. Dirks;
Donald D. Dirks
UCLA School of Medicine, Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Los Angeles, California 90024
Search for other works by this author on:
David E. Ellison
David E. Ellison
UCLA School of Medicine, Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Los Angeles, California 90024
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 347–354 (1989)
Article history
Received:
April 25 1988
Accepted:
August 16 1988
Citation
Judy R. Dubno, Donald D. Dirks, David E. Ellison; Stop‐consonant recognition for normal‐hearing listeners and listeners with high‐frequency hearing loss. I: The contribution of selected frequency regions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 January 1989; 85 (1): 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.397686
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Effects of hearing loss on utilization of short‐duration spectral cues in stop consonant recognition
J Acoust Soc Am (June 1987)
Stop‐consonant recognition for normal‐hearing listeners and listeners with high‐frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions
J Acoust Soc Am (January 1989)
Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise
J Acoust Soc Am (July 1984)
Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing‐impaired listeners
J Acoust Soc Am (April 1989)
Predicting consonant confusions from acoustic analysis
J Acoust Soc Am (January 1981)