In the present study, speech‐recognition performance was measured in four hearing‐impaired subjects and twelve normal hearers. The normal hearers were divided into four groups of three subjects each. Speech‐recognition testing for the normal hearers was accomplished in a background of spectrally shaped noise in which the noise was shaped to produce masked thresholds identical to the quiet thresholds of one of the hearing‐impaired subjects. The question addressed in this study is whether normal hearers with a hearing loss simulated through a shaped masking noise demonstrate speech‐recognition difficulties similar to those of listeners with actual hearing impairment. Regarding overall percent‐correct scores, the results indicated that two of the four hearing‐impaired subjects performed better than their corresponding subgroup of noise‐masked normal hearers, whereas the other two impaired listeners performed like the noise‐masked normal listeners. A gross analysis of the types of errors made suggested that subjects with actual and simulated losses frequently made different types of errors.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
Article navigation
March 1987
March 01 1987
Recognition of nonsense syllables by hearing‐impaired listeners and by noise‐masked normal hearers
Larry E. Humes;
Larry E. Humes
Division of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232
Search for other works by this author on:
Donald D. Dirks;
Donald D. Dirks
Division of Head and Neck Surgery, U.C.L.A. School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90024
Search for other works by this author on:
Theodore S. Bell;
Theodore S. Bell
Division of Head and Neck Surgery, U.C.L.A. School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90024
Search for other works by this author on:
Gail E. Kincaid
Gail E. Kincaid
Division of Head and Neck Surgery, U.C.L.A. School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90024
Search for other works by this author on:
Larry E. Humes
Donald D. Dirks
Theodore S. Bell
Gail E. Kincaid
Division of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 81, 765–773 (1987)
Article history
Received:
February 04 1986
Accepted:
October 15 1986
Citation
Larry E. Humes, Donald D. Dirks, Theodore S. Bell, Gail E. Kincaid; Recognition of nonsense syllables by hearing‐impaired listeners and by noise‐masked normal hearers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 March 1987; 81 (3): 765–773. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.394845
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
Related Content
Discrimination of time‐varying signals by hearing‐impaired listeners
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)
Perception of stop consonant formant transitions by normal and high‐frequency sensorineurally hearing‐impaired listeners: Identification and psychoacoustic evidence
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)
On the use of masking to simulate the effects of sensorineural hearing loss on speech recognition
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)
Midfrequency dysfunction in noise‐exposed persons
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)
Psychometric effects of adding realism to a speech-in-noise test
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2013)