In forward masking, performance may be affected by confusion, that is, by the difficulty of discriminating a suprathreshold signal from the preceding masker. This study investigated confusion effects for forward maskers composed of repeated bursts of a 1000‐Hz sinusoid followed by sinusoidal signals; such ‘‘pulsing’’ maskers produce confusion when the properties of the signal are identical to those of an individual masker ‘‘pulse.’’ The level, frequency, and duration of the signal relative to an individual masker pulse, as well as offset–onset delay, were varied to determine the minimum change necessary to eliminate confusion. For maskers composed of 20‐ms pulses, confusion was eliminated by changes in signal level of 5 dB or changes in signal frequency of 30 to 40 Hz. For maskers composed of 10‐, 20‐, or 40‐ms pulses, confusion was eliminated by signal delays of 8 to 16 ms or by signal durations less than half or greater than twice the masker‐pulse duration. Results with adaptive procedures designed to measure confusion‐free or confusion‐determined thresholds suggest that confusion effects can be minimized or avoided by extensive listener training with a procedure in which the signal and masker are not presented at similar intensities.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 1985
December 01 1985
Stimulus parameters governing confusion effects in forward masking
Donna L. Neff
Donna L. Neff
Boys Town National Institute for Communication Disorders in Children, 555 North 30th Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68131
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78, 1966–1976 (1985)
Article history
Received:
February 25 1985
Accepted:
August 15 1985
Citation
Donna L. Neff; Stimulus parameters governing confusion effects in forward masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 December 1985; 78 (6): 1966–1976. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.392653
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Confusion effects with sinusoidal and narrow‐band noise forward maskers
J Acoust Soc Am (May 1986)
Effects of pure‐tone forward masker duration on psychophysical measures of frequency selectivity
J Acoust Soc Am (December 1987)
Adaptation of suppression as an explanation of enhancement effectsa)
J Acoust Soc Am (July 1993)
Signal properties that reduce masking by simultaneous, random‐frequency maskers
J Acoust Soc Am (October 1995)
Additivity of forward masking
J Acoust Soc Am (December 1983)