The problems associated with performing pure‐tone threshold measurements in reverberant or diffuse sound fields are illustrated with the use of three‐dimensional representations of the sound field within a typical test booth. A microphone mounted on a motorized trolley is used to perform these measurements. A comprehensive comparison is then made of the efficiency with which FM tones, AM tones, damped wave trains, and narrow bands of noise provide a uniform sound field. The conclusion is reached that the bandwidth of the stimulus is the major factor determining the uniformity of the field. A decision about the most appropriate stimulus for sound field work must thus be based on factors other than field uniformity. When the constraints of obtaining suitable spectral distributions, and being able to relate thresholds obtained with complex stimuli to those obtained with pure tones are also considered, FM tones and suitably generated narrow bands of noise appear to be the most suitable stimuli. The selection of suitable parameters is discussed and an Appendix discusses the spectrum and bandwidth of FM signals with different modulation waveforms. The relative accuracy of testing in the direct and reverberant regions in a nonanechoic environment is also discussed.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 1982
January 01 1982
Comparison of stimuli used in sound field audiometric testing
Harvey Dillon;
Harvey Dillon
National Acoustic Laboratories, 5 Hickson Road, Millers Point, NSW 2000, Sydney, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Gary Walker
Gary Walker
National Acoustic Laboratories, 5 Hickson Road, Millers Point, NSW 2000, Sydney, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71, 161–172 (1982)
Citation
Harvey Dillon, Gary Walker; Comparison of stimuli used in sound field audiometric testing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 January 1982; 71 (1): 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.387343
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Does sound symbolism need sound?: The role of articulatory movement in detecting iconicity between sound and meaning
Mutsumi Imai, Sotaro Kita, et al.
Related Content
Acoustic method for calibration of audiometric bone vibrators. II. Harmonic distortion
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (June 2013)
Audiometric variability
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Motivational benefits of audiometric monitoring
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Comparison of the reliability of an Auraldome headset and a standard headset in obtaining pure‐tone audiometric threshold measures
J Acoust Soc Am (July 1976)
The effect of audiometric headphone position on the measurements of threshold levels
J Acoust Soc Am (May 2002)