Computer simulations of traffic sound levels were performed to evaluate the probable effectiveness of several hypothetical noise abatement strategies in reducing residential exposure to traffic sound. These simulations were performed for 28 actual census tracts in six cities which were chosen to be representative of the urban United States. Results showed that limits on noise levels during acceleration for new automobiles would have only a small effect on traffic noise exposure, while limits on truck‐acceleration noise levels would have a greater effect. Nonresidential zoning along arterials was calculated to have a greater effect than automobile‐noise limits, but a smaller effect than truck‐noise limits. A hypothetical vehicle fleet including large proportions of four‐cylinder and diesel‐powered automobiles was calculated to produce slightly greater residential noise exposure than at present.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 1981
January 01 1981
Analysis of traffic noise abatement strategies
Gregory W. Cermak;
Gregory W. Cermak
Societal Analysis Department, General Motors Research Laboratories, Warren, Michigan 48090
Search for other works by this author on:
Calvin R. von Buseck;
Calvin R. von Buseck
Societal Analysis Department, General Motors Research Laboratories, Warren, Michigan 48090
Search for other works by this author on:
John G. Cervenak;
John G. Cervenak
Societal Analysis Department, General Motors Research Laboratories, Warren, Michigan 48090
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert D. Blanchard
Robert D. Blanchard
Transportation and Traffic Science Department, General Motors Research Laboratories, Warren, Michigan 48090
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 69, 158–170 (1981)
Citation
Gregory W. Cermak, Calvin R. von Buseck, John G. Cervenak, Robert D. Blanchard; Analysis of traffic noise abatement strategies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 January 1981; 69 (1): 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.385360
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Related Content
An analysis of traffic noise abatement scenarios
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
The use of local opportunities in aircraft noise abatement planning
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
A comparison of community noise abatement strategies
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Urban Noise Action Planning ‐ an integrated approach towards noise abatement in the frame of urban development: Tools and recommendations developed within the SILENCE project
J Acoust Soc Am (May 2008)
Long duration wind noise abatement measurements at the University of Mississippi Field Station
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2015)