Three groups of chinchillas, each consisting of five monaural animals, were exposed to one of three conditions: 1 h of sinusoidal, 30‐Hz vibration at 1 g rms; 50 noise impulses at 155 dB, 1.5‐m A duration, at the rate of 1/min; or a combination of the vibration and the impulse noise. Before exposure, and at various times after exposure, each animal’s auditory evoked responses (AER) were measured at seven frequencies between 0l5 and 8.0 kHz. Thirty days after the exposure all animals were sacrificed for cochlear surface preparation histology. Chinchillas exposed to the vibration alone showed no significant temporary or permanent change in AER thresholds. The group exposed to impulse noise showed a maximum median TTS of from 34 dB at 0.5 kHz to 72 dB at 2 kHz and a flat PTS of 15–20 dB between 1 and 2.8 kHz. The combination group at all test times and frequencies showed a greater TTS and PTS than did the groups exposed to noise or vibration alone. The cochleograms are related in a variety of ways with hearing thresholds. The data from all three groups of experimental animals are consistent and demonstrate a potentiating effect of vibration on an impulse noise exposure.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
Article navigation
March 1980
March 01 1980
The interaction of whole body vibration and impulse noise
Roger P. Hamernik;
Roger P. Hamernik
Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, State University of New York, Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, New York 13210
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13210
Search for other works by this author on:
Donald Henderson;
Donald Henderson
Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, State University of New York, Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, New York 13210
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13210
Search for other works by this author on:
Donald Coling;
Donald Coling
Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, State University of New York, Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, New York 13210
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13210
Search for other works by this author on:
Norma Slepecky
Norma Slepecky
Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, State University of New York, Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, New York 13210
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13210
Search for other works by this author on:
Roger P. Hamernik
,
Donald Henderson
,
Donald Coling
,
Norma Slepecky
,
Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, State University of New York, Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, New York 13210
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67, 928–934 (1980)
Citation
Roger P. Hamernik, Donald Henderson, Donald Coling, Norma Slepecky; The interaction of whole body vibration and impulse noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 March 1980; 67 (3): 928–934. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.383942
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
I can't hear you without my glasses
Tessa Bent
Related Content
The effects of impulse noise level on the magnitude of asymptotic threshold shift (ATS) in the chinchilla
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)
An isohazard function for impulse noise
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 1993)
The importance of ‘‘temporal pattern’’ in traumatic impulse noise exposures
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (July 1991)
Conditioning-induced protection from impulse noise in female and male chinchillas
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2000)
The cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from the normal and noise‐damaged chinchilla cochlea
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 1996)