The noise‐producing region of a suppressed turbojet exhaust is studied by cross‐correlating static pressure fluctuations within the exhaust with farfield sound for Mach numbers up to Mj=0.99, using a 31‐tube nozzle having an area ratio Ar=3.1. Measurements made with an unsuppressed turbojet exhaust having an equivalent exit area and operating under effectively equal thrust levels serve as the experimental control for this work. Static pressure‐level measurements, made with a calibrated high‐temperature acoustically damped probe tube, show that noise suppression by multitube nozzles results from reduced turbulence levels. The maximum fluctuating static‐pressure level in the unsuppressed turbojet exhaust is typically 5–6 dB higher than static‐pressure levels in the suppressed exhaust under conditions of effectively equal static thrust. This suggests that the turbulence intensity in the multitube suppressor flow is reduced in excess of 20% compared with the unsuppressed jet exhaust. Static pressure fluctuation spectrums in the suppressor flow are peaked at the eddy passage frequency and a double spectral peak is found in the region where the suppressor jets coalesce. Estimates of the eddy‐scale‐length to jet‐diameter ratio made from measurements of local jet velocity and eddy passage frequency indicate that a reduction in eddy size occurs when neighboring suppressor tube flows are brought into close proximity to one another. Maximum normalized cross‐correlation coefficients in the unsuppressed turbojet exhaust of approximately cPF?0.2 are found for Mj=0.99 at an angle of 30° from the jet axis. Normalized cross‐correlation coefficients are significantly lower in the interior of the multitube suppressor flow. Measurements of the partially normalized cross‐correlation function show that sound radiated from within the hot, high‐speed suppressor flow is refracted by the flow from neighboring jets. This work demonstrates that the high‐frequency sound radiated directly to the farfield by a multitube suppressor nozzle is primarily from the exterior tubes and that the overall suppression of noise can be attributed to a reduction in turbulence intensity.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 1978
June 01 1978
Multitube turbojet noise‐suppression studies using cross‐correlation techniques
Dennis R. Regan;
Dennis R. Regan
University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024
Search for other works by this author on:
William C. Meecham
William C. Meecham
University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 1753–1767 (1978)
Citation
Dennis R. Regan, William C. Meecham; Multitube turbojet noise‐suppression studies using cross‐correlation techniques. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 June 1978; 63 (6): 1753–1767. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381915
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
A history of jet noise research at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2021)
Effects of forward velocity on noise for a J85 turbojet engine with multi‐tube suppressor from wind tunnel and flight tests
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Characterization of supersonic jet noise and its control
J Acoust Soc Am (October 2014)
Parametric analysis of a down-scaled turbo jet engine suitable for drone and UAV propulsion
AIP Conference Proceedings (April 2018)
Temporal suppression of the click-evoked otoacoustic emission level-curve
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (March 2011)