Categorical perception was investigated in a series of experiments on the perception of melodic musical intervals (sequential frequency ratios). When procedures equivalent to those typically used in speech‐perception experiments were employed, (i.e., determination of identification and discrimination functions for stimuli separated by equal physical increments), musical intervals were perceived categorically by trained musicians. When a variable‐step‐size (adaptive) discrimination procedure was used, evidence of categorical perception (in the form of smaller interval‐width DL’s for ratios at identification category boundaries than for ratios within categories), although present initially, largely disappeared after subjects had reached asymptotic performance. However, equal‐step‐size discrimination functions obtained after observers had reached asymptotic performance in the adaptive paradigm were not substantially different from those initially obtained. The results of other experiments imply that this dependence of categorical perception on procedure may be related to differences in stimulus uncertainty between the procedures. An experiment on the perception of melodic intervals by musically untrained observers showed no evidence for the existence of ’’natural’’ categories for musical intervals.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
February 1978
February 01 1978
Categorical perception—phenomenon or epiphenomenon: Evidence from experiments in the perception of melodic musical intervals
Edward M. Burns;
Edward M. Burns
Hearing Research Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
Search for other works by this author on:
W. Dixon Ward
W. Dixon Ward
Hearing Research Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 456–468 (1978)
Citation
Edward M. Burns, W. Dixon Ward; Categorical perception—phenomenon or epiphenomenon: Evidence from experiments in the perception of melodic musical intervals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 February 1978; 63 (2): 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381737
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
On the dichotomy in auditory perception between temporal envelope and fine structure cues (L)
J Acoust Soc Am (September 2004)
Melodic interval perception by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2014)
The existence region for melodic pitch and computational models
J Acoust Soc Am (May 2002)
Discrimination of interval size in short tone sequences
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2007)
Effects of musical and linguistic experience on categorization of lexical and melodic tones
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2016)